Wettability of two different artificial saliva substitutes on injection moulded heat polymerized acrylic resin and CAD-CAM acrylic resin: an in vitro study.
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2023.184##semicolon##
wettability##common.commaListSeparator## artificial saliva substitute##common.commaListSeparator## CAD-CAM acrylic resin##common.commaListSeparator## injection moulded acrylic resin##common.commaListSeparator## contact angle##common.commaListSeparator## Mouth Kote##common.commaListSeparator## Wet mouth.要旨
Aim: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the wettability of two different artificial saliva substitutes on injection moulded heat-polymerized acrylic resin and CAD-CAM acrylic resin and to compare these properties with natural saliva and distilled water.
Materials and method: Forty heat polymerized (injection moulded) acrylic resin specimens and forty CAD-CAM acrylic resin specimens were fabricated with each specimen measuring 10x10x2mm. Four groups of liquids namely distilled water, Wet mouth™, Mouth Kote™ and human saliva were used. A contact angle goniometer was used to measure the contact angles. Two contact angle readings were obtained on the right side and on the left side of the test specimen. The observations were recorded and a mean of the two readings was calculated. The same procedure was repeated for all specimens (heat cure resin and CAD-CAM) with all the four test groups of liquids.
Results: Contact angle measurements were significantly higher in Wet mouth™ and Mouth Kote™ solution of heat cure resin group compared to the CAD-CAM group (p-value<0.05 for both). Mouth Kote™ had lower mean contact angle (62.63 ± 4.59) than Wet mouth™ (77.46 ± 9.16) on CAD/CAM denture base resin. Mouth Kote also had lower mean contact angle (70.80 ± 4.79) than Wet mouth™ (97.77 ± 7.79) on injection moulded denture base resin.
Conclusion: Mouth kote had better wettability than wet mouth on both CAD-CAM and injection moulded acrylic resin. Both the saliva substitutes had better wettability on CAD-CAM than on injection moulded acrylic resin.
##submission.citations##
Aydin AK, Terzioglu H, Ulubaram K, Hasirci N. Wetting properties of saliva substitutes on acrylic resin. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:473-7.
Davies A, Finlay IG. Oral care in advanced disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 100-3.
van der ReijdenWA, Veerman ECI, Nieuw Amerongen AV. Treatment of oral dryness related complaints (xerostomia) in Sjögren’s syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:465-73.
Kilani BHZ, Retief DH, Guldag MV, Castleberry DJ, Fischer TE. Wettability of selected denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:288-91.
Park MS, Kim YK. Viscosity and wettability of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) solution and artificial saliva. J Oral Med 2007;32:365-73.
Kilani BHZ, Retief DH, Guldag MV, Castleberry DJ, Fischer TE. Wettability of selected denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:288-91.
Jaiswal N, Patil PG, Gangurde A, Parkhedkar RD. Wettability of 3 different artificial saliva substitutes on heat-polymerized acrylic resin. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019 Mar 1;121(3):517-22.
Glickman TS. Glossary of meteorology. 2nd ed. American Meteorological Society (2000).
Lira AF, Consani RL, Mesquita MF, Nóbilo MA, Henriques GE. Effect of toothbrushing, chemical disinfection and thermocycling procedures on the surface microroughness of denture base acrylic resins. Gerodontology. 2012 Jun;29(2):e891-7.
Monsenego P, Baszkin AM, de Lourdes Costa M, Lejoyeux J. Complete denture retention. Part II: wettability studies on various acrylic resin denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:308-12.
Vissink A, De Jong HP, Busscher HJ, Arends JS, 's-Gravenmade EJ. Wetting properties of human saliva and saliva substitutes. Journal of dental research. 1986 Sep;65(9):1121-4.
Ramanna PK. Wettability of three denture base materials to human saliva, saliva substitute, and distilled water: A comparative in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2018;18:248-56.
Al‐Dwairi ZN, Tahboub KY, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Özcan M. A comparison of the surface properties of CAD/CAM and conventional polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019 Apr;28(4):452-7.
Van der Reijden WA, Veerman EC, Nieuw Amerongen AV. Rheological properties of commercially available polysaccharides with potential use in saliva substitutes. Biorheology. 1994 Jan 1;31(6):631-42.
##submission.downloads##
出版済
巻号
セクション
##submission.license##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
