Evaluation of Microhardness of self-adhesive Pediatric Filling

نویسندگان

  • Sohaib Qais Alwan
  • Rusul Saad Ahmed
  • Ali Saad Ahmed M.Sc prosthodontics, Tikrit university, Tikrit, Iraq
  • Saif Saad Kamil

DOI::

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2025.822

کلمات کلیدی:

Fluoride release, Glass Ionomer Cement, Microhardness, Surefil One

چکیده

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how beverages affected the self-adhesive hybrid pediatric cement's microhardness.

Materials and Methods: Specimens measuring 5 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness were fabricated from Surefil one self-adhesive hybrid GIC and subjected to exposure by acidic beverages. The study involved three groups (artificial saliva as control, Cola, Sparkling water with lemon). Samples for Vickers hardness were immersed for 15 minutes daily for 28 days. Then, samples were tested using a Vickers microhardness tester. Statistical analysis involved the use of one-way Anova and post hoc Tucky test at the level of significance of 0.05.

Results: When Surefil One samples were submerged in simulated saliva, their Vickers microhardness significantly decreased. Samples submerged in Cola showed the largest decline, indicating a negative impact on material integrity.

Conclusions: Beverages affected the self-adhesive hybrid pediatric cement's microhardness.

مراجع

Park EY, Kang S. Current aspects and prospects of glass ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2020 Jul;37(3):169. doi: 10.5152/yujm.2020.01. [DOI not available]

Hill R. Glass ionomer polyalkenoate cements and related materials: past, present and future. Br Dent J. 2022 May 13;232(9):653-7. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-3796-5.

Pratap B, Gupta RK, Bhardwaj B, Nag M. Resin based restorative dental materials: Characteristics and future perspectives. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2019 Nov 1;55(1):126-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.08.001.

Iftikhar S, Jahanzeb N, Saleem M, ur Rehman S, Matinlinna JP, Khan AS. The trends of dental biomaterials research and future directions: A mapping review. Saudi Dent J. 2021 Jul 1;33(5):229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.04.005.

Sikka N, Brizuela M. Glass ionomer cement. StatPearls. 2024 Mar 4. [DOI not available]

Jaiswal S, Pusarapu K, Alla RK, Guduri V, AV R, Mc SS. Solubility of glass ionomer cement in various acidic beverages at different time intervals: an in vitro study. Int J Dent Mater. 2022 Dec 31;4(3):78-81. doi: 10.1097/IDM.0000000000000211.

Ganesh S, Ganesh SB, Jayalakshmi S. Effect of carbonated beverages on flexural strength property of restorative glass ionomer cement. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Nov 1;13(Suppl 1). doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_238_22.

Nica I, Stoleriu S, Iovan A, Tărăboanță I, Pancu G, Tofan N, Brânzan R, Andrian S. Conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cement surface characteristics after acidic challenges. Biomedicines. 2022 Jul 21;10(7):1755. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10071755.

Hübel S, Mejàre I. Conventional versus resin‐modified glass‐ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3‐year clinical study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003 Jan;13(1):2-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7439.2003.00420.x.

Wan Bakar WZ, Abdullah A, Hussien A. Erosion effect of acidic drinks on two types of glass ionomer cement. Malays Dent J. 2011 Jul 1;33(2). [DOI not available]

AHMED, Ali Saad; KAMIL, Saif Saad; ARAB, Luma Nasrat. Assessment of peel bond strength between two facial prosthetic materials after surface treatment methods: In vitro study. Journal of International Oral Health, 2024, 16.1: 63-68.‏

Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007 Mar 1;23(3):343-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.009.

AHMED, Ali Saad, et al. Influence of Some Plant Extracts on Antifungal Properties, Hardness, and Peel Bond Strength of Heat-Cured Denture Soft Liner. Diyala Journal of Medicine, 2024, 26.2: 14-28.‏

Vandever C. Introduction to research statistical analysis: An overview of the basics. HCA Healthcare J Med. 2020;1(2):71. [DOI not available]

Hasan AM, Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. Fluoride release and uptake in enhanced bioactivity glass ionomer cement (“glass carbomer™”) compared with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Feb 21;27. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0230.

Hasan AM, Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. Fluoride release and uptake in enhanced bioactivity glass ionomer cement (“glass carbomer™”) compared with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Feb 21;27. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0230.

AHMED, Ali Saad; AHMED, Rusal Saad; ARAB, Luma Nasrat. The antifungal potential of cinnamon oil incorporated into a heat-polymerized soft liner. Journal of Dental Materials & Techniques, 2024, 13.3.‏

Altamimi A, Majeed MA. Development and assessment of new bioactive glass fiber post. Part II: Ion’s release. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021 Jul 1;15(3). doi: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i3.14530.

ISO 9917-1:2007 Dentistry—Water-based cements—Part 1: Powder/liquid acid-base cements; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [DOI not applicable]

Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, Nixon PJ. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review. Br Dent J. 2017 Mar 10;222(5):337-44. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.263.

Ibrahim MF, Selivany BJ. Marginal adaptation of self-adhesive (SureFil One) and conventional bulk-fill composites: An in vitro study. J Duhok Univ. 2023 May 4;26(1):101-8. doi: 10.26682/sjuod.2023.26.1.14.

Valinoti AC, Neves BG, Silva EM, Maia LC. Surface degradation of composite resins by acidic medicines and pH-cycling. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16:257-65. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572008000300003.

Münchow EA, Ferreira AC, Machado RM, Ramos TS, Rodrigues-Junior SA, Zanchi CH. Effect of acidic solutions on the surface degradation of a micro-hybrid composite resin. Braz Dent J. 2014;25:321-6. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201300035003.

Zhao Q, Gao Y, Jin X, Han F, Chen K, Chen C. Influence of acidic environment on hydrolytic stability of MDP-Ca salts with nanolayered and amorphous structures. Int J Nanomedicine. 2022 Apr 13;17:1695-709. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S334292.

Facio RC, Vieira-Junior W, Basting RT, Turssi CP, do Amaral FL, França FM. Influence of fluoride-releasing materials in the inhibition of enamel and dentin demineralization around restorations. Braz Dent Sci. 2022 Dec 19;25(4). doi: 10.5935/1678-4391.20220052.

Kukiattrakoon B, Hengtrakool C, Kedjarune-Leggat U. Effect of acidic agents on surface roughness of dental ceramics. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011;8(1):6. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.78697.

Bitencourt SB, Catanoze IA, da Silva EV, Dos Santos PH, Dos Santos DM, Turcio KH, Guiotti AM. Effect of acidic beverages on surface roughness and color stability of artificial teeth and acrylic resin. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Apr;12(2):55. doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.55.

Zimmer S, Kirchner G, Bizhang M, Benedix M. Influence of various acidic beverages on tooth erosion. Evaluation by a new method. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 2;10(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129462.

Almudaihesh F, Holford K, Pullin R, Eaton M. The influence of water absorption on unidirectional and 2D woven CFRP composites and their mechanical performance. Compos Part B Eng. 2020 Feb 1;182:107626. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107626.

Abuzenada BM, Souror YR, Waly AS, Khlifa Y. Mutans streptococci growth on glass ionomer incorporated with chlorhexidine: in-vivo study. Braz Dent Sci. 2020;23(2):1-7. doi: 10.5935/1678-4391.20200013.

##submission.downloads##

چاپ شده

2025-02-17

شماره

نوع مقاله

Mechanisms of Oral Disease