Effects of Gadolinium Oxide Nanoparticles and Curing Techniques on the Acrylic Mechanical Properties

著者

  • Mithaq R. Mohammed College of dentistry-Al-Iraqia University/ Iraq-Baghdad
  • Abdalbseet A. Fatalla Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Matheel Al-Rawas Prosthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
  • Yanti Johari School of Dentistry, Management and Science University, University Drive off Persiaran Olahraga, Section 13, 40100 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2026.1126

##semicolon##

Prosthodontics##common.commaListSeparator## Dentures##common.commaListSeparator## Tooth Loss

要旨

Objective: This study investigated the effects of gadolinium oxide (Gd₂O₃) nanoparticles on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and compared the mechanical properties of denture base resins cured via UV laser and conventional water bath techniques.

Methods: Forty PMMA specimens were prepared, with half incorporating Gd₂O₃ nanoparticles. Samples were cured using one of two methods: a UV laser (150–400 nm wavelength, 10–25 minutes irradiation time) or a conventional water bath (74°C for 8 hours). The mechanical properties of all specimens were evaluated through transverse strength testing, porosity analysis, and surface roughness measurements.

Results: UV laser-cured specimens exhibited significantly higher transverse strength and significantly reduced porosity compared to water bath-cured specimens. Surface roughness showed a slight, non-significant increase with laser curing. The findings suggest that UV laser curing, combined with Gd₂O₃ nanoparticles, enhances PMMA’s mechanical properties, offering a faster, more precise alternative to traditional water bath curing with potential clinical benefits in denture durability.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that UV laser curing, especially when combined with Gd₂O₃ nanoparticles, enhances PMMA’s mechanical properties by improving polymerization efficiency and reducing porosity. This method offers a faster and more precise alternative to traditional water bath curing, with potential clinical benefits for denture durability and performance.

##submission.citations##

1. Woelfel JB, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT. Dimensional changes occurring in dentures during processing. J Am Dent Assoc. 1960 Oct;61(4):413–30.

2. Craig RG, Peyton FA, Asgar K. Restorative dental materials. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1975.

3. Rahal JS, Mesquita MF, Henriques GEP, Nóbilo MAA. Surface roughness of acrylic resins submitted to mechanical and chemical polishing. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Nov;31(11):1075–9.

4. P RD. Denture base resins. In: Phillips’ science of dental materials. 2003. p. 721–57.

5. Ruyter IE, Buykuilmaz S. Effect of polymerization. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:588–93.

6. Schneider RL, Curtis ER, Clancy JMS. Tensile bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to a microwave- or heat-processed denture base. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Aug;88(2):145–50.

7. Hasan RH. Denture teeth bond strength to heat water bath and microwave cured acrylic denture base materials: a comparative study [master’s thesis]. University of Mosul; 2002.

8. Shibayama R, Filho HG, Mazaro JVQ, Vedovatto E, Assunção WG. Effect of flasking and polymerization techniques on tooth movement in complete denture processing. J Prosthodont. 2009 Apr 6;18(3):259–64.

9. Kahil H, Faramawy A, El-Sayed H, Abdel-Sattar A. Magnetic properties and SAR for gadolinium-doped iron oxide nanoparticles prepared by hydrothermal method. Crystals (Basel). 2021 Sep 22;11(10):1153.

10. Arora S, Khindaria S, Garg S, Mittal S. Comparative evaluation of linear dimensional changes of four commercially available heat cure acrylic resins. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011;2(3):182–8.

11. Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater. 2016 Jan;32(1):54–64.

12. Rueggeberg FA. State-of-the-art: Dental photocuring—a review. Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):39–52.

13. Wigdor HA, Walsh JT Jr, Featherstone JDB, Visuri SR, Fried D, Waldvogel JL. Lasers in dentistry. Lasers Surg Med. 1995;16(2):103–33.

14. Al-Nori A, Hussain A, Rejab L. Water sorption of heat-cured acrylic resin. Al-Rafidain Dent J. 2007;7(2):186–94.

15. Tzanakakis EGC, Skoulas E, Pepelassi E, Koidis P, Tzoutzas IG. A review of the use of lasers in contemporary dental practices. Turk J Public Health Dent. 2023;3(2):22–6.

16. Frentzen M, Koort HJ. Lasers in dentistry: new possibilities with advancing laser technology? Int Dent J. 1990;40(6):323–32.

17. Harashima T, Kinoshita JI, Kimura Y, Brugnera A, Zanin F, Pecora JD, et al. Morphological comparative study on ablation of dental hard tissues at cavity preparation by Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005 Feb;23(1):52–5.

18. Pero AC, Marra J, Paleari AG, de Souza RF, Ruvolo-Filho A, Compagnoni MA. Reliability of a method for evaluating porosity in denture base resins. Gerodontology. 2011 Jun;28(2):127–33.

19. Walsh L. The current status of laser applications in dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2003 Sep 12;48(3):146–55.

20. Pelagalli J, Gimbel CB, Hansen RT, Swett A, Winn DW. Investigational study of the use of Er:YAG laser versus dental drill for caries removal and cavity preparation—Phase I. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1997;15(3):109–15.

21. Einstein A. Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung. Phys Z. 1917;18:121.

22. Baena E, Escribano N, Fuentes V, Reche I, Ceballos L. Aging effect on push-out bond strength of six resin cements: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;18(6):1371.

23. Mohammed AA. Effect of zirconium oxide addition on some mechanical and physical properties of acrylic resin. 2022. p. 020022.

##submission.downloads##

出版済

2026-02-12

巻号

セクション

Adults & the Elderly