Effects of Gadolinium Oxide Nanoparticles and Curing Techniques on the Acrylic Mechanical Properties

Autoři

  • Mithaq R. Mohammed College of dentistry-Al-Iraqia University/ Iraq-Baghdad
  • Abdalbseet A. Fatalla Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Matheel Al-Rawas Prosthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
  • Yanti Johari School of Dentistry, Management and Science University, University Drive off Persiaran Olahraga, Section 13, 40100 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2026.1126

Klíčová slova:

Prosthodontics, Dentures, Tooth Loss

Abstrakt

Objective: This study investigated the effects of gadolinium oxide (Gd₂O₃) nanoparticles on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and compared the mechanical properties of denture base resins cured via UV laser and conventional water bath techniques.

Methods: Forty PMMA specimens were prepared, with half incorporating Gd₂O₃ nanoparticles. Samples were cured using one of two methods: a UV laser (150–400 nm wavelength, 10–25 minutes irradiation time) or a conventional water bath (74°C for 8 hours). The mechanical properties of all specimens were evaluated through transverse strength testing, porosity analysis, and surface roughness measurements.

Results: UV laser-cured specimens exhibited significantly higher transverse strength and significantly reduced porosity compared to water bath-cured specimens. Surface roughness showed a slight, non-significant increase with laser curing. The findings suggest that UV laser curing, combined with Gd₂O₃ nanoparticles, enhances PMMA’s mechanical properties, offering a faster, more precise alternative to traditional water bath curing with potential clinical benefits in denture durability.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that UV laser curing, especially when combined with Gd₂O₃ nanoparticles, enhances PMMA’s mechanical properties by improving polymerization efficiency and reducing porosity. This method offers a faster and more precise alternative to traditional water bath curing, with potential clinical benefits for denture durability and performance.

Reference

1. Woelfel JB, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT. Dimensional changes occurring in dentures during processing. J Am Dent Assoc. 1960 Oct;61(4):413–30.

2. Craig RG, Peyton FA, Asgar K. Restorative dental materials. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1975.

3. Rahal JS, Mesquita MF, Henriques GEP, Nóbilo MAA. Surface roughness of acrylic resins submitted to mechanical and chemical polishing. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Nov;31(11):1075–9.

4. P RD. Denture base resins. In: Phillips’ science of dental materials. 2003. p. 721–57.

5. Ruyter IE, Buykuilmaz S. Effect of polymerization. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:588–93.

6. Schneider RL, Curtis ER, Clancy JMS. Tensile bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to a microwave- or heat-processed denture base. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Aug;88(2):145–50.

7. Hasan RH. Denture teeth bond strength to heat water bath and microwave cured acrylic denture base materials: a comparative study [master’s thesis]. University of Mosul; 2002.

8. Shibayama R, Filho HG, Mazaro JVQ, Vedovatto E, Assunção WG. Effect of flasking and polymerization techniques on tooth movement in complete denture processing. J Prosthodont. 2009 Apr 6;18(3):259–64.

9. Kahil H, Faramawy A, El-Sayed H, Abdel-Sattar A. Magnetic properties and SAR for gadolinium-doped iron oxide nanoparticles prepared by hydrothermal method. Crystals (Basel). 2021 Sep 22;11(10):1153.

10. Arora S, Khindaria S, Garg S, Mittal S. Comparative evaluation of linear dimensional changes of four commercially available heat cure acrylic resins. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011;2(3):182–8.

11. Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater. 2016 Jan;32(1):54–64.

12. Rueggeberg FA. State-of-the-art: Dental photocuring—a review. Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):39–52.

13. Wigdor HA, Walsh JT Jr, Featherstone JDB, Visuri SR, Fried D, Waldvogel JL. Lasers in dentistry. Lasers Surg Med. 1995;16(2):103–33.

14. Al-Nori A, Hussain A, Rejab L. Water sorption of heat-cured acrylic resin. Al-Rafidain Dent J. 2007;7(2):186–94.

15. Tzanakakis EGC, Skoulas E, Pepelassi E, Koidis P, Tzoutzas IG. A review of the use of lasers in contemporary dental practices. Turk J Public Health Dent. 2023;3(2):22–6.

16. Frentzen M, Koort HJ. Lasers in dentistry: new possibilities with advancing laser technology? Int Dent J. 1990;40(6):323–32.

17. Harashima T, Kinoshita JI, Kimura Y, Brugnera A, Zanin F, Pecora JD, et al. Morphological comparative study on ablation of dental hard tissues at cavity preparation by Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005 Feb;23(1):52–5.

18. Pero AC, Marra J, Paleari AG, de Souza RF, Ruvolo-Filho A, Compagnoni MA. Reliability of a method for evaluating porosity in denture base resins. Gerodontology. 2011 Jun;28(2):127–33.

19. Walsh L. The current status of laser applications in dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2003 Sep 12;48(3):146–55.

20. Pelagalli J, Gimbel CB, Hansen RT, Swett A, Winn DW. Investigational study of the use of Er:YAG laser versus dental drill for caries removal and cavity preparation—Phase I. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1997;15(3):109–15.

21. Einstein A. Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung. Phys Z. 1917;18:121.

22. Baena E, Escribano N, Fuentes V, Reche I, Ceballos L. Aging effect on push-out bond strength of six resin cements: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;18(6):1371.

23. Mohammed AA. Effect of zirconium oxide addition on some mechanical and physical properties of acrylic resin. 2022. p. 020022.

Stahování

Publikováno

2026-02-12

Číslo

Sekce

Adults & the Elderly