Evaluation of Salivary and Oral Cell Collection Methods for Genomic DNA Extraction

Autori

  • Clarissa Christina Avelar Fernandez Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2786-4146
  • Fernanda Farage da Costa Felipe Ferreira Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  • Christiane Vasconcellos Cruz Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  • Marcelo de Castro Costa Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2019.91

Parole chiave:

DNA, Saliva, Genetics

Abstract

The use of saliva and oral cells as sources of biological material has gained attention, due to advantages such as facility, non-invasiveness, and great patient acceptance. The objective of the study was to compare four different types of saliva and oral buccal cell collecting methods for genomic DNA extraction: (1)Expectoration of saliva, (2)Expectoration of saliva with lingual stimulation, (3)Scraping with cytological brush, and (4)Scraping with cytological brush and expectoration of saliva. The sample was composed of students and employees from the Dental School of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (n = 20, 10 men and 10 women with mean age of 47.60 ± 15.70 and 20.50 ± 2.1, respectively). The collections were performed with an interval of at least one day between them and the participants were instructed to stay for less than 30 minutes without eating food and brushing teeth. Samples were stored at -20°C until DNA extraction was performed using a commercially available kit (Qiagen®). Differences in DNA yield between methods were test for statistical significance with an alpha of 0.05. No sexual dimorphism was observed in relation to the concentration of DNA (p=0.76), age (p=0.91), and ethnicities (p=0.72). There was no significant difference between the collection methods in relation to the quantity and purity of the extracted DNA (p≥0.05). All methods gave lower DNA yields than the ones obtained from blood or saliva collected through comercial kits and maybe carefully use forclinical diagnostic purposes or for research experiements requiring higher DNA concentrations.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Avaliação do rendimento, pureza e integridade do DNA genômico em diferentes protocolos de coleta de células bucais. Waltrick-Zambuzzi MR, Vieira, TCS, Romanos HF, Macedo EE, Granjeiro JM, Kuchler EC. Int J Dent, Recife. 2012 jan/mar; 11(1):12-18.

Comparison of different collection procedures and two methods for DNA isolation from saliva. Durdiaková J, Kamodyivá N, Ostatníková D, Vlková B, Celec P. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012; 50(4):643–647.

Determinants of DNA yield and purity collected with buccal cell samples. Van Wieren-de Wijer DBMA, Maitland-van der Zee AH, de Boer A, Belitser SV, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, Schiffers P, Janssen RGJH, van Duijn CM, Stricker BHCH, Klungel OH. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009; 24: 677-682.

Comparison of methods for collection of DNA samples by mail in the black women´s helth study. Cozier YC, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L. Ann Epidemiol. 2004; V. 14, P.117-122.

DNA yeld and quality of saliva samples and suitability for large-scale epidemiological studies in children. Koni AC, Scott RA, Wang G, Bailey MES, Peplies J, Bammann K, Pirsiladis YP. Internt Journ of Obes. 2011; V. 35. P 113-118.

Diagnostic potential of saliva: current state and future applications. Pfaffe T, Cooper-White J, Beyerlein P, Kosner K, Punyadeera C. Clinc Chem. 2011; V. 57. P 675-687.

Quality and quantity of saliva DNA obtained from the self-administrated oragene method - a pilot study on the cohort of swedish men. Rylander-Rudqvist T, Hankansson N, Tybring G, Wolk, Alicja. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(9).

Comparative study of five commercially avaiable saliva collection kits for DNA extraction. Deeley K, Noel J, Vieira ARClin Lab. 2016; 1;62(9):1809-1813.

Collection of buccal cell DNA in seventh-grade children using water and a toothbrush. London SJ, Xia J, Lehman TA, Yang J, Granada E, Chunhong L, Dubeau L, Li T, David-Beabes GL, Li Y. Canc Epid Biom Prev, 2001; v.10, p.1227-1230.

Quality of DNA extracted from saliva samples collected with the Oragene DNA self- collection kit. Nuner AP, Oliveira IO, Santos BR, Millech C, Silva LP, González DA, Hallal PC, Menezes AMBB, Araújo CL, Barros F. Med Reserch Method. 2012.

Collection of blood, saliva and buccal cell samples in a pilot study on the danish nurse cohort: comparison of the response rate and quality of genomic DNA. Hansen TO, Simonsen MK, Nielsen FC, Hundrup YA. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; V. 16. P.2072-2076.

Buccal DNA collection: comparison of buccal swabs with FTA cards. Milne E, Bockxmeer FMV, Robertson L, Brisbane JM, Ashton LJ, Scott RJ, Armstrong BK. Canc Epid Biom Prev. 2006; V.15. P. 816-819.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2019-07-25

Fascicolo

V. 7 N. 1 (2019)

Sezione

Development of Craniofacial Structures

Licenza

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.