Reframing Water Response in Glass Ionomer Cement: Gravimetric Effects of Yttrium Oxide Nanoparticle Substitution

نویسندگان

  • Ruqaya Ammar Shamel
  • Zuha Ayad Jaber collage of dentistry \ university of kufa

DOI::

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2026.1639

کلمات کلیدی:

glass ionomer cement, luting cement, yttrium oxide, nanoparticles, gravimetric analysis, water exposure

چکیده

The objective of this work was to evaluate water-related mass changes in a conventional glass ionomer luting cement following partial substitution of its powder with yttrium oxide nanoparticles (Y₂O₃). Forty discs (10 mm diameter; 2.5 mm thickness) were prepared using 0, 1, 3, or 5 wt% Y₂O₃ powder substitution (n = 10 per formulation). The same specimens underwent 24-hour water immersion, 24-hour drying, and seven additional days of re-immersion. Initial, wet, and post-drying masses defined net wet mass change and apparent mass loss as percentages. Overall formulation effects were evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Welch sensitivity analyses reconstructed from group summaries. Net wet mass change ranged from 0.338% to 0.716% at the first assessment and from 1.036% to 1.614% at the second. Y5 had the lowest mean apparent mass loss: 3.090 ± 0.165% and 3.422 ± 0.449%, compared with 5.556 ± 1.023% and 6.609 ± 1.122% in the control. These represented descriptive reductions of 44.4% and 48.2%. Conventional ANOVA indicated overall formulation differences for net wet mass change (p = 0.0057 and 0.0108) and apparent mass loss (both p < 0.001). Welch analyses also indicated overall differences at both assessments. The 5 wt% formulation had the lowest mean apparent mass loss while exhibiting higher mean net wet mass change than the control. The results describe short-term gravimetric behavior and do not establish improved mechanical performance or clinical durability.

مراجع

1. Smith DC. Development of glass-ionomer cement systems. Biomaterials. 1998;19(6):467-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00126-9

2. Walls AWG. Glass polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cements: a review. Journal of Dentistry. 1986;14(6):231-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(86)90030-8

3. Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan KP. New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. Biomaterials. 1998;19(6):479-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00127-0

4. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2016;7(3):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb7030016

5. Nicholson JW, Brookman PJ, Lacy OM, Wilson AD. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Study of the Role of Tartaric Acid in Glass-ionomer Dental Cements. Journal of Dental Research. 1988;67(12):1451-1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670120201

6. Crisp S, Pringuer MA, Wardleworth D, Wilson AD. Reactions in Glass Ionomer Cements: II. An Infrared Spectroscopic Study. Journal of Dental Research. 1974;53(6):1414-1419. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345740530062001

7. Pires R, Nunes TG, Abrahams I, Hawkes GE, Morais CM, Fernandez C. Stray-field imaging and multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies on the setting of a commercial glass-ionomer cement. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2004;15(3):201-208. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jmsm.0000015479.65516.d0

8. Zainuddin N, Karpukhina N, Hill RG, Law RV. A long-term study on the setting reaction of glass ionomer cements by 27Al MAS-NMR spectroscopy. Dental Materials. 2009;25(3):290-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.008

9. Stamboulis A, Law RV, Hill RG. Characterisation of commercial ionomer glasses using magic angle nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS-NMR). Biomaterials. 2004;25(17):3907-3913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.074

10. Wasson EA, Nicholson JW. New Aspects of the Setting of Glass-ionomer Cements. Journal of Dental Research. 1993;72(2):481-483. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720020201

11. Nicholson JW. Maturation processes in glass-ionomer dental cements. Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica. 2018;4(1):63-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2018.1497492

12. Elsaka SE, Hamouda IM, Swain MV. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and antibacterial properties. Journal of Dentistry. 2011;39(9):589–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.05.006

13. Gjorgievska E, Nicholson JW, Gabrić D, Guclu ZA, Miletić I, Coleman NJ. Assessment of the Impact of the Addition of Nanoparticles on the Properties of Glass–Ionomer Cements. Materials. 2020;13(2):276. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020276

14. Shahid S, Hassan U, Billington RW, Hill RG, Anderson P. Glass ionomer cements: Effect of strontium substitution on esthetics, radiopacity and fluoride release. Dental Materials. 2014;30(3):308-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.003

15. De Caluwé T, Vercruysse CWJ, Fraeyman S, Verbeeck RMH. The influence of particle size and fluorine content of aluminosilicate glass on the glass ionomer cement properties. Dental Materials. 2014;30(9):1029-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.06.003

16. Gu YW, Yap AUJ, Cheang P, Kumar R. Spheroidization of glass powders for glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials. 2004;25(18):4029-4035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.096

17. Khurshid Z, Zafar M, Qasim S, Shahab S, Naseem M, AbuReqaiba A. Advances in Nanotechnology for Restorative Dentistry. Materials. 2015;8(2):717-731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8020717

18. Moshaverinia A, Roohpour N, Chee WWL, Schricker SR. A review of powder modifications in conventional glass-ionomer dental cements. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2011;21(5):1319-1328. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm02309d

19. Amin F, Rahman S, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS, Sefat F, Kumar N. Effect of Nanostructures on the Properties of Glass Ionomer Dental Restoratives/Cements: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Materials. 2021;14(21):6260. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216260

20. Makanjuola J, Deb S. Chemically Activated Glass-Ionomer Cements as Bioactive Materials in Dentistry: A Review. Prosthesis. 2023;5(1):327-345. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5010024

21. Nicholson JW, Sidhu SK, Czarnecka B. Fluoride exchange by glass-ionomer dental cements and its clinical effects: a review. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry. 2023;10(1):2244982. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2023.2244982

22. Rajakumar G, Mao L, Bao T, Wen W, Wang S, Gomathi T, Gnanasundaram N, Rebezov M, Shariati MA, Chung IM, Thiruvengadam M, Zhang X. Yttrium Oxide Nanoparticle Synthesis: An Overview of Methods of Preparation and Biomedical Applications. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(5):2172. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052172

23. Andelman T, Gordonov S, Busto G, Moghe PV, Riman RE. Synthesis and Cytotoxicity of Y2O3 Nanoparticles of Various Morphologies. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2010;5(2):263–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-009-9445-0

24. Schubert D, Dargusch R, Raitano J, Chan SW. Cerium and yttrium oxide nanoparticles are neuroprotective. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2006;342(1):86-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.129

25. Jaber ZA. Reinforcement of Glass Ionomer Cement by Yttrium Oxide Nanoparticle Substitution. Dentistry 3000. 2026;14(1):a001. https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2026.1227

26. Hussein F. Evaluation of Water Sorption and Solubility of Nano Titania Enriched Glass Ionomer Cement Considering the Storage Solution and Time. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2022;16(1):e187421062210070. https://doi.org/10.2174/18742106-v16-e221018-2022-40

27. Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Moshaverinia M, Roohpour N, Darr JA, Rehman I. Effects of incorporation of hydroxyapatite and fluoroapatite nanobioceramics into conventional glass ionomer cements (GIC). Acta Biomaterialia. 2008;4(2):432-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2007.07.011

28. Lucas ME, Arita K, Nishino M. Toughness, bonding and fluoride-release properties of hydroxyapatite-added glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials. 2003;24(21):3787-3794. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00260-6

29. Chiu SY, Shinonaga Y, Abe Y, Harada K, Arita K. Influence of Porous Spherical-Shaped Hydroxyapatite on Mechanical Strength and Bioactive Function of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement. Materials. 2017;10(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010027

30. Gu YW, Yap AUJ, Cheang P, Khor KA. Effects of incorporation of HA/ZrO2 into glass ionomer cement (GIC). Biomaterials. 2005;26(7):713-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.019

31. Ahmad Shiekh R, Ab Rahman I, Malik Masudi S, Luddin N. Modification of glass ionomer cement by incorporating hydroxyapatite-silica nano-powder composite: Sol–gel synthesis and characterization. Ceramics International. 2014;40(2):3165-3170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.09.127

32. Fareed MA, Stamboulis A. Nanoclay addition to a conventional glass ionomer cements: Influence on physical properties. European Journal of Dentistry. 2014;8(4):456-463. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.143619

33. De Caluwé T, Vercruysse CWJ, Ladik I, Convents R, Declercq H, Martens LC, Verbeeck RMH. Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements: Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility. Dental Materials. 2017;33(4):e186-e203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.007

34. Yli-Urpo H, Närhi T, Söderling E. Antimicrobial effects of glass ionomer cements containing bioactive glass (S53P4) on oral micro-organisms in vitro. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2003;61(4):241-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310004719

35. Yli-Urpo H, Lassila LVJ, Närhi T, Vallittu PK. Compressive strength and surface characterization of glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass. Dental Materials. 2005;21(3):201-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.006

36. Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Clare A, Petschelt A, Greil P. Toughening of dental glass ionomer cements with reactive glass fibres. Biomaterials. 2004;25(22):5217-5225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.027

37. Berzins DW, Abey S, Costache MC, Wilkie CA, Roberts HW. Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Setting Reaction Competition. Journal of Dental Research. 2010;89(1):82-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509355919

38. Czarnecka B, Nicholson JW. Ion release by resin-modified glass-ionomer cements into water and lactic acid solutions. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34(8):539-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.08.007

39. Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. The biocompatibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements for dentistry. Dental Materials. 2008;24(12):1702-1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.005

40. Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Payan J, Moya F, Meyer JM. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dental Materials. 1999;15(1):71-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00016-0

41. Mitsuhashi A, Hanaoka K, Teranaka T. Fracture toughness of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials: effect of powder/liquid ratio and powder particle size reduction on fracture toughness. Dental Materials. 2003;19(8):747-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(03)00022-8

42. Lin J, Zhu J, Gu X, Wen W, Li Q, Fischer-Brandies H, Wang H, Mehl C. Effects of incorporation of nano-fluorapatite or nano-fluorohydroxyapatite on a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Acta Biomaterialia. 2011;7(3):1346-1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.029

43. Lee JJ, Lee YK, Choi BJ, Lee JH, Choi HJ, Son HK, Hwang JW, Kim SO. Physical Properties of Resin-Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Micro and Nano-Hydroxyapatite. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2010;10(8):5270-5276. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2010.2422

44. Jafarpour D, Mese A, Ferooz M, Bagheri R. The effects of nanofilled resin-based coatings on the physical properties of glass ionomer cement restorative materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2019;89:103177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.015

45. Amin F, Moin SF, Kumar N, Asghar MA, Mahmood SJ, Palma PJ. The Impact of Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles on the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Glass Ionomer Dental Materials. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025;26(11):5382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26115382

46. Abozaid D, Ayad A, Ibrahim Y, Azab A, El-Aal MA, El-Safty S. Green-Synthesized titanium dioxide Nanoparticle–Modified glass ionomer cement: in vitro and in Silico assessment of Mechanical, Physical, and safety properties performance. Scientific Reports. 2026;16(1):5890. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37048-2

47. Yan H, Yang H, Li K, Yu J, Huang C. Effects of Chlorhexidine-Encapsulated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles on the Anti-Biofilm and Mechanical Properties of Glass Ionomer Cement. Molecules. 2017;22(7):1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22071225

48. Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B, Limanowska-Shaw H. The long-term interaction of dental cements with lactic acid solutions. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 1999;10(8):449-452. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008991422909

49. El Mallakh BF, Sarkar NK. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements in de-ionized water and artificial saliva. Dental Materials. 1990;6(2):118-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(05)80041-7

50. Andersson ÖH, Dahl JE. Aluminium release from glass ionomer cements during early water exposure in vitro. Biomaterials. 1994;15(11):882-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(94)90111-2

51. Okada K, Tosaki S, Hirota K, Hume WR. Surface hardness change of restorative filling materials stored in saliva. Dental Materials. 2001;17(1):34-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00053-1

52. Moreau JL, Xu HHK. Fluoride releasing restorative materials: Effects of pH on mechanical properties and ion release. Dental Materials. 2010;26(11):e227-e235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.07.004

53. Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Movasaghi Z, Billington RW, Darr JA, Rehman IU. Modification of conventional glass-ionomer cements with N-vinylpyrrolidone containing polyacids, nano-hydroxy and fluoroapatite to improve mechanical properties. Dental Materials. 2008;24(10):1381-1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.008

##submission.downloads##

چاپ شده

2026-10-22

شماره

دوره 14 شماره 3 (2026): Fall

نوع مقاله

Mechanisms of Oral Disease

مجوز

حق نشر 2026 Ruqaya Ammar Shamel , Zuha Ayad Jaber

Creative Commons License

این پروژه تحت مجوز بین المللی Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 می باشد.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.