A Potential Natural Alternative to Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes: An in Vivo Study in Rats

Autores/as

  • Mariana Bezamat University of Pittsburgh
  • Alice Spitz
  • Daniela Sales Alviano
  • Dayanne Lopes da Silva
  • Vicente Telles
  • Marcia Grillo Cabral
  • Ana Maria Bolognese

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2023.503

Palabras clave:

Alternative medicine, cytotoxicity, Plant extract, Aristolochia cymbifera, Oral medicine

Resumen

Background: In the Brazilian northeast region, the leaves of a plant scientifically known as Aristolochia cymbifera (A. cymbifera) are therapeutically used to treat different conditions, including fevers, ulcers and stomach disorders. Objective: To explore its effects in the oral cavity, this study aimed to evaluate the presence of morphological, cellular, and tissue modifications in the oral mucosa of rats treated with different A. cymbifera solutions. Materials and Methods: The rats were divided into 6 groups: Group 1 was treated with 0.3 ml of vehicle (DMSO and water); Group 2 treated with 0.3 ml of A. cymbifera-ethanolic extract 4mg/ml; Group 3 treated with 0.3 ml of A. cymbifera-hexane extract 4mg/ml; Group 4 treated with 0.3 ml of A. cymbifera-ethanolic extract 10mg/ml; Group 5 treated with 0.3 ml of A. cymbifera-hexane extract 10mg/ml; and Group 6 treated with 0.3 ml of chlorhexidine gluconate 0.12%. All groups were treated twice daily by applying the solutions into the oral cavity, over a total period of 24 days. To analyze cytotoxicity on cells, the micronucleus test was performed, and an additional histopathologic analysis was conducted in order to evaluate tissue changes such as inflammatory infiltration, desquamation, and degeneration of cells. Results: Results showed that the cytotoxicity of the A cymbifera -based solutions was similar to those of chlorhexidine, and all groups showed morphological characteristics of normal mucosa after treatments. Conclusion: It is concluded that no cytotoxicity was present after treatment with extracts of Aristolochia cymbifera, showing its potential for the development of future clinical trials.

Citas

Madan, C., et al., A knowledge, attitude, and practices study regarding dental floss among dentists in India. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2014. 18(3): p. 361-8.

Lucchese, A., et al., Changes in oral microbiota due to orthodontic appliances: a systematic review. J Oral Microbiol, 2018. 10(1): p. 1476645.

Chen, F. and D. Wang, Novel technologies for the prevention and treatment of dental caries: a patent survey. Expert Opin Ther Pat, 2010. 20(5): p. 681-94.

de Oliveira, J.R., et al., Mouthwashes: an in vitro study of their action on microbial biofilms and cytotoxicity to gingival fibroblasts. Gen Dent, 2018. 66(2): p. 28-34.

Haas, A.N., et al., Mouthwashes for the control of supragingival biofilm and gingivitis in orthodontic patients: evidence-based recommendations for clinicians. Braz Oral Res, 2014. 28(spe): p. 1-8.

Benson, P.E., et al., Fluorides, orthodontics and demineralization: a systematic review. J Orthod, 2005. 32(2): p. 102-14.

Helms, J.A., et al., Effects of chlorhexidine on human taste perception. Arch Oral Biol, 1995. 40(10): p. 913-20.

Mulani, M.S., et al., Emerging Strategies to Combat ESKAPE Pathogens in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review. Front Microbiol, 2019. 10: p. 539.

Khameneh, B., et al., Review on plant antimicrobials: a mechanistic viewpoint. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2019. 8: p. 118.

Alviano, W.S., et al., In vitro antioxidant potential of medicinal plant extracts and their activities against oral bacteria based on Brazilian folk medicine. Arch Oral Biol, 2008. 53(6): p. 545-52.

Erdemir, E.O., A. Sengun, and M. Ulker, Cytotoxicity of mouthrinses on epithelial cells by micronucleus test. Eur J Dent, 2007. 1(2): p. 80-5.

Tolbert, P.E., C.M. Shy, and J.W. Allen, Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies in buccal smears: a field test in snuff users. Am J Epidemiol, 1991. 134(8): p. 840-50.

Giorgetti, M., G. Negri, and E. Rodrigues, Brazilian plants with possible action on the central nervous system: a study of historical sources from the 16th to 19th century. J Ethnopharmacol, 2007. 109(2): p. 338-47.

Archivos adicionales

Publicado

2023-10-20

Número

Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2023)

Sección

Development of Craniofacial Structures

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2023 Mariana Bezamat, Alice Spitz, Daniela Sales Alviano, Dayanne Lopes da Silva, Vicente Telles, Marcia Grillo Cabral, Ana Maria Bolognese

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.