Maximum mouth opening in healthy children and adolescents in Istanbul

Autores

  • Mine Koruyucu Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Istanbul, Turkey http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2077-5095
  • Derya Tabakcilar Yeditepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Figen Seymen Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Koray Gençay Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2018.82

Palavras-chave:

Maximal mouth opening, interincisal distance, children, mouth width

Resumo

Objectives: Mouth opening capacity is often regarded as one of the important parameters for evaluating the function of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and masticatory muscle status. A reduced mouth opening capacity may be one of the first clinical signs of TMJ involvement. The purpose of this study was to create age related percentiles for the maximal interincisal distance (MID) of healthy children. Methods: The patients admitted for routine dental examinations to Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics were included in this study. The interincisal measurements were performed with metallic calliper and also malocclusions were recorded for all children. Oneway Anova test, Tukey HDS test, Tamhane’s T2 test and Student t test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The study population comprised of 1059 (569 males, 490 females), 3-to 15-year-old (mean age 8.82±3.06) children. The mean score of maximal inter-incisal distance was found 33.24±5.54 for females; 33.32±5.71 for males. There was no statistically significant difference according to gender (p=0.815; p>0.05). The mean score of maximal inter-incisal distance was found 28.63±4.34 for 3-5 years; 33.52±4.84 for 6-11 years; 37.35±5.52 for 12-15 years children. Statistically significant differences were found between age groups (p: 0.001; p<0.01). The mean score of maximal inter-incisal distance was found 32.9±5.6 for class I; 34.92±5.51 for class II; 35.2±5.36 for class III malocclusions. Statistically significant differences were found between malocclusion groups (p:0.001; p<0.01). Conclusion: The result of this study indicated that positive relationship between the maximum mouth opening and age and malocclusion.

Referências

On the development, morphol-ogy and function of the temporo-mandibular joint in the light of the orofacial system. Fanghanel J, Gedrange T. Annals of Anatomy. 2007;189:314–9. PMID:17695983

The face- physiognomic expres-siveness and human identity. Fanghanel J, Gedrange T, Proff P. Annals of Anatomy. 2006;188:261–6. PMID:16711165

Normal mouth opening in the adult French population. Placko G, Bellot-Samson V, Brunet S. Revue De Stomatologie Et De Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale. 2005;106:267–71. PMID:16292219

An index for the measurement of normal maximum mouth open-ing. Zawawi KH, Al-Badawi EA, Lo-bo SL, Melis M, Mehta NR. Journal Canadian Dental Association. 2003;69:737–41. PMID:14653940

Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. Dworkin S, LeResche L. Craniomandibular Disorders. 1992;6:300–55. PMID:1298767

Maximal mouth opening in Indi-an children using a new method. Kumar A, Mehta R, Goel M, Dutta S, Hooda A. Journal of Cranio-maxillary Diseases. 2012;1:79–86.

An Analysis of maximum man-dibular movements, craniofacal relationships and temporoman-dibular joint awareness in chil-dren. Rothenberg LH. The Angle Orthodontist. 1991;61:103–12. PMID:2064068

Evaluation of mandibular range of motion in Brazilian children and its correlation to age, height, weight, and gender. Sousa LM De, Nagamine HM, Chaves TC, Grossi DB, Regalo SCH, Oliveira AS De. Brazilian Oral Research. 2008;22:61–6. PMID:18425247

Maximal mouth opening capaci-ty : percentiles for healthy chil-dren 4 – 17 years of age. Müller L, Waes H Van, Langerweger C, Mo-linari L, Saurenmann RK. Paedita-tric Rheumatology. 2013;22: 11-17. PMID:23607797

Clinical measurement of nor-mal maximum mouth opening in children. Abou-Atme YS, Chedid N, Melis M, Zawawi KH. Journal of Craniomandibular Practice. 2008;26:191–6. PMID:18686495

Signs and symptoms of tem-poromandibular disorders and oral parafunctions in urban Saudi Ara-bian adolescents: a research re-port. Feteih RM. Head & face med-icine. 2006;2:25. PMID:16914032

Analysis of maximum mouth opening and its related factors in 3- to 5-year-old Taiwanese chil-dren. Chen H Sen, Yang PL, Lee CY, Chen KK, Lee KT. Odontology. 2013;1–5. PMID:24174163

Determining the mandibular range of motions in children from Bahia state. Benevides SD, Araujo RP, Ribeiro C de O, Mello SMF. Re-vista CEFAC. 2016;18:95–103.

Maximum mouth opening in Saudi Adolescents. Al-Dlaigan YH, Asiry M. Journal of International Oral Health. 2014;6:45–9. PMID:25628483

Measurement of maximum mouth opening in 2 to 6 year-old Korean children. Choi H, Kim C, Lee D, Yang Y, Kim J. Journal of The Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2015;42:242–3.

The normal range of mouth opening. Mezitis M, Rallis G, Zach-ariades N. Journal of Oral Maxillo-facial Surgery. 1989;47:1028−9. PMID:2795295

Maximal incisal opening: a di-agnostic index? Sheppard I, Shep-pard S. The Journal of Dental Med-icine. 1965;20:13–5. PMID:14232340

Signs of temporomandibular disorders in girls receiving ortho-dontic treatment . A prospective and longitudinal comparison with untreated Class II malocclusions and normal occlusion subjects. Henrikson T, Nilner M, Kurol J. Eu-ropean journal of orthodontics. 2000;22:271–81. PMID:10920559

Normal mouth opening in an adult Indian population. Khare N, Patil S, Kale S, Sumeet J, Sonali I, Sumeet B. Journal Maxillofacial Oral Surgery. 2012;11:309–13. PMID:23997482

Normal range of maximal mouth opening amongst north Indian population : a cross sec-tional study in Meerut. Gupta S, Sreenisavan V, Goel S. Indian Journal of Research. 2016;5:534–6.

Clinical characterization of mouth opening among Mexican adolescents and young adults. Casanova-Rosado J, Medina-Solis C, Casanova-Rosado A, Vallejos-Sanchez A, Patino-Marin N, Mau-pome G, et al. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2012;7:81–4.

Discriminant validity of tem-poromandibular joint range of mo-tion measurements obtained with a ruler. Walker N, Bohannon RW, Cameron D. The Journal of ortho-paedic and sports physical thera-py. 2000;30:484–92. PMID:10949505

The range of inter-incisal open-inig among university students of Ajman, UAE. Sohail A, Amjad A. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2011;31:37–42.

The normal range of mouth opening in an Irish population. Gallagher C, Gallagher V, Whelton H, Cronin M. Journal of oral reha-bilitation. 2004;31:110–6. PMID:15009593

Maximum mouth opening. Sawair FA, Hassoneh YM, Al-Zawawi BM, Baqain ZH. Saudi Medical Journal. 2010;962:369–73. PMID:20383412

Signs and symptoms of tem-poromandibular joint disorders related to the degree of mouth opening and hearing loss. Kitsoulis P, Marini A, Iliou K, Galani V, Zim-pis A, Kanavaros P, et al. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders. 2011;11:1–8. PMID:21612586

Maximum mouth opening of ethnic Chinese in Taiwan. Yao KT, Lin CC, Hung CH. Journal of Dental Sciences. Association for Dental Sciences of The Republic of China; 2009;4:40–4.

The normal range of maximum mouth opening and its correlation with height or weight in the young adult Chinese population. Li X, Jia C, Zhang Z. Journal of Dental Sci-ences; 2017;12:56–9.

Sex differences in mandibular movements during opening and closing. Lewis RP, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS. American Jour-nal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2001;120:294–303. PMID:11552129

Concomitant mandibular and head-neck movements during jaw opening – closing in man. Eriksson P, Zafar H, Nordh E. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 1998;25:859–70. PMID:9846906

Comparison of maximum mouth-opening capacity and con-dylar path length in adults and children during the growth period. Reicheneder C, Proff P, Baumert U, Gedrange T. Annals of Anato-my. 2008;190:344–50. PMID:18595675

Cross sectional: normal maxi-mal incisal opening and associa-tions with physical variables in children. Ying QV, Bacic J, Abramowicz S, Sonis A. Pediatric dentistry. 2013;35:61–6. PMID:23635901

A comparison of three meth-ods of measuring maximal opening of the mouth. Wood G, Branco J. Journal of Oral Surgery. 1979;37:175–7. PMID:283218

Effect of head position on ver-tical mandibular opening. Higbie EJ, Seidel-Cobb D, Taylor LF, Cummings GS. Journal of Ortho-paedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1999;29:127–30. PMID:10322587

Evaluation of the applicability of temporomandibular opening index in Turkish children with and without signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disor-ders. Sari S, Kucukesmen C, Son-mez H. Journal of Craniomandibu-lar Practice. 2014;26:197–201. PMID:18686496

Range of movement of mandi-ble in children. Ingervall B. Scandi-navian Journal of Dental Research. 1970;78:311–22.PMID:5274221

Analysis of maximum mouth opening and its related factors in 3- to 5-year-old Taiwanese chil-dren. Chen HS, Yang PL, Lee CY, Chen KK, Lee KT. Odontology. 2013;1–5. PMID:24174163

Downloads

Publicado

2018-07-13

Edição

v. 6 n. 1 (2018)

Seção

Development of Craniofacial Structures

Licença

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.