Tridimensional roughness and morphology of sound dentin surfaces after papain-gel treatment

著者

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2022.176

##semicolon##

dental caries##common.commaListSeparator## chemomechanical caries removal##common.commaListSeparator## dental materials##common.commaListSeparator## dentin##common.commaListSeparator## papain##common.commaListSeparator## pediatric dentistry

要旨

Purpose: To investigate the effect of chemomechanical caries removing agents (CCRAs) based on papain (Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000®) over dentin surfaces compared with 37% phosphoric acid and 11.5% polyacrylic acid.

Materials and methods: Sound human molars were sectioned at the crown level, resulting in 48 dentin blocks, which were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=12): 1) Papacárie Duo Gel®; 2) Brix3000®; 3) 11.5% polyacrylic acid solution and 4) 37% phosphoric acid gel. All products were applied for 30s. Ten blocks per group were analyzed by a non-contact 3D profilometer before and after treatments for linear (Ra) and volumetric roughness (Sa). The superficial morphology of the remaining blocks in each group (n=2) was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Normality was rejected for the data (Shapiro-Wilk test) and therefore, Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s proof or Wilcoxon signed rank test with its respective effect size calculation were used to compare the results with α=5%.

Results: Ra and Sa values for specimens submitted to Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000® were statistically similar to baseline values. Application of phosphoric and polyacrylic acid resulted in a statistically increase in roughness compared to the CCRAs. SEM evaluation showed that Papacárie Duo Gel® resulted in surface debris. Polyacrylic acid and Brix3000®resulted in partial opening of the tubules but dentin exposed to polyacrylic was able to remove more smear layer than Brix3000®, while phosphoric acid resulted in total opening of the dentinal tubules.

Conclusion: Both Papacárie Duo Gel® and Brix3000® did not result in roughness changes when applied in sound dentin.

##submission.citations##

The global prevalence of dental healthcare needs and unmet dental needs among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ghafari M, Bahadivand-Chegini S, Nadi T, Doosti-Irani A. Epidemiol Health. 2019;41:e2019046. http://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2019046. PMID: 31778605.

Current update of chemomechanical caries removal methods. Hamama H, Yiu C, Burrow M. Aust Dent J. 2014;59(4):446-56. http://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12214. PMID: 25131424.

Current concepts and techniques for caries excavation and adhesion to residual dentin. Neves AA, Coutinho E, Cardoso MV, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13(1):7-22. http://doi.rg/10.3290/j.jad.a18443. PMID: 21403932.

Caries removal by chemomechanical (Carisolv) vs rotary drill: A systematic review. Maru VP, Shakuntala BS, Nagarathna C. Open Dent J. 2015;9:462-72. http://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601509010462. PMID: 26962375.

Caries-removal effectiveness of a papain-based chemo-mechanical agent: A quantitative micro-CT study. Neves AA, Lourenco RA, Alves HD, Lopes RT, Primo LG. Scanning. 2015;37(4):258-264. http://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21206. PMID: 25809787.

Chemo-mechanical caries removal with Papacarie: Case series with 84 reports and 12 months of follow-up. Bussadori SK, Godoy CH, Alfaya TA, Fernandes KP, Mesquita-Ferrari RA, Motta LJ. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014;15(2):250-3. http://doi.org/ 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1523. PMID: 25095852.

Pain during removal of carious lesions in children: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Motta LJ, Bussadori SK, Campanelli AP, da Silva AL, Alfaya TA, de Godoy CH, et al. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:896381. http://doi.org/10.1155/2013/896381.

Comparing the efficacies of two chemo-mechanical caries removal agents (2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel and Brix 3000), in caries removal and patient cooperation: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Alkhouli MM, Al Nesser SF, Bshara NG, AlMidani AN, Comisi JC. J Dent. 2020;93:103280. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103280. PMID: 31981604.

Caries-removal effectiveness and minimal-invasiveness potential of caries-excavation techniques: a micro-CT investigation. Neves AA, Coutinho E, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. J Dent. 2011;39(2):154-62. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.11.006. PMID: 21111770.

Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of three minimally invasive methods of caries removal: An in vitro study. Boob AR, Manjula M, Reddy R, Srilaxmi R, Rani T. Int J Clin Ped Dent. 2014;7(1):11-8. http://doi.org/ 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1226. PMID: 25206231.

Papain-like cysteine proteases. Bromme D. Curr Prot Protein Sci. 2001;21(1):1-14. http://doi.org/10.1002/0471140864.ps2102s21

Chemo-mechanical removal of caries in an adolescent patient using a papain gel: case report. Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Hermida Bruno ML, Ram D. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008;32(3):177-80. http://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.32.3.1168770338617085. PMID: 18524264.

Biocompatibility analysis of chemomechanical caries removal material Papacarie on cultured fibroblasts and subcutaneous tissue. Martins MD, Fernandes KP, Motta LJ, Santos EM, Pavesi VC, Bussadori SK. J Dent Child. 2009;76(2):123-9. PMID: 19619425.

Clinical and radiographic study of chemical-mechanical removal of caries using Papacarie: 24-month follow up. Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Bachiega JC, Santis TO, Motta LJ. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35(3):251-4. http://doi.org/ 10.17796/jcpd.35.3.75803m02524625h5. PMID: 21678665.

Clinical threshold for carious tissue removal. Kidd EA. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54(3):541-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2010.03.001. PMID: 20630195.

Papain gel: a new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvao AC. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005;30(2):115-9. http://doi.org/ 10.17796/jcpd.30.2.xq641w720u101048. PMID: 16491964.

Managing carious lesions: Consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjorndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, et al. Adv Dent Res. 2016;28(2):58-67. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639271. PMID: 27099358.

The influence of Carisolv on enamel and dentine surface topography. Wennerberg A, Sawase T, Kultje C. Eur J Oral Sci. 1999;107(4):297-306. http://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107410.x. PMID: 10467946.

Effect of a chemo-mechanical caries removal system (CarisolvTM) on dentin topography of non-carious dentin. Cederlund A, Lindskog S, Blomlof J. Acta Odontol Scand. 1999;57(4):185-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428751. PMID: 10540927.

Scanning electron microscopic observations of human dentine after mechanical caries excavation. Banerjee A, Kidd EAM, Watson TF. J Dent. 2000;28(3):179-86. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00064-0. PMID: 10709339.

Comparative evaluation of effects of chemo-mechanical and conventional caries removal on dentinal morphology and its bonding characteristics: An SEM study. Arora R, Goswami M, Chaudhary S, Chaitra TR, Kishor A, Rallan M. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012;13(4):179-84. http://doi.org/10.1007/bf03262867. PMID: 22883356.

SEM Analysis of residual dentin surface in primary teeth using different chemomechanical caries removal agents. Thakur R, Patil SDS, Kush A, Madhu K.. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41(4):289-93. http://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-41.4.289. PMID: 28650784.

Dentin topographic features following chemomechanical caries removal in primary teeth. Kotb RM, Elkateb MA, Ahmed AM, Kawana KY, El Meligy OA. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(6):472-9. http://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-40.6.472. PMID: 27805895.

Evaluation of residual dentin after conventional and chemomechanical caries removal using SEM. Correa FN, Rodrigues Filho LE, Rodrigues CR. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008;32(2):115-20. http://doi.org/ 10.17796/jcpd.32.2.44n2787118133880. PMID: 18389676.

Chemomechanical caries removal: a comprehensive review of the literature. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E. Int Dent J. 2001;51(4):291-9. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-595x.2001.tb00841.x. PMID: 11570545.

Buonocore Memorial Lecture - Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-35. PMID: 12760693.

Effectiveness of etching by three acids on the morphological and chemical features of dentin tissue. Kharouf N, Mancino D, Naji-Amrani A, Eid A, Haikel Y, Hemmerle J. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(8):915-9. PMID: 31797847.

Correlative transmission electron microscopy examination of nondemineralized and demineralized resin-dentin interfaces formed by two dentin adhesive systems. Van Meerbeek B, Conn LJ, Duke ES, Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Guerrero D. J Dent Res. 1996;75(3):879-88. http://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750030401. PMID: 8675798.

The effect of dentine pre-treatment using bioglass and/or polyacrylic acid on the interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Sauro S, Watson T, Moscardo AP, Luzi A, Feitosa VP, Banerjee A. J Dent. 2018;73(1):32-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.03.014. PMID: 29609016.

Papain-gel degrades intact nonmineralized type I collagen fibrils. Bertassoni LE, Marshall GW. Scanning. 2009;31(6):253-8. http://doi.org/10.1002/sca.20171. PMID: 20205185.

Effect of papain-based gel on type I collagen - spectroscopy applied for microstructural analysis. Junior ZS, Botta SB, Ana PA, Franca CM, Fernandes KP, Mesquita-Ferrari RA, et al. Scientific reports. 2015;5:11448. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11448.

Mineral content removal after Papacarie application in primary teeth: a quantitative analysis. Bittencourt ST, Pereira JR, Rosa AW, Oliveira KS, Ghizoni JS, Oliveira MT. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;34(3):229-31. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.34.3.k15t8q1805538524. PMID: 20578660.

Microtensile bond strength of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems to demineralized dentin after the use of a papain-based chemomechanical method. Gianini RJ, do Amaral FL, Florio FM, Basting RT. Am J Dent. 2010;23(1):23-8. PMID: 20437723.

Morphology and microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to in situ-formed caries-affected dentin after the use of a papain-based chemomechanical gel method. Botelho Amaral FL, Martao Florio F, Bovi Ambrosano GM, Basting RT. Am J Dent. 2011;24(1):13-9. PMID: 21469401.

Effect of a papain-based gel for chemomechanical caries removal on dentin shear bond strength. Lopes MC, Mascarini RC, da Silva BM, Florio FM, Basting RT.. J Dent Child. 2007;74(2):93-7. PMID: 18477426.

##submission.downloads##

出版済

2022-03-25

巻号

巻 10 号 1 (2022)

セクション

Infancy & Adolescence

##submission.license##

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.