Assessment of the Alignment Acceleration of the Lower Incisors Using a Single Aligner Appliance Modified with Nickel-Titanium Coils: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Adults.

著者

  • Ziad Mohamad Alhafi
  • Nada Rajeh
  • Zaher Jumaa
  • Zuhir Alasfar

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2024.532

##semicolon##

Aligners##common.commaListSeparator## Teeth alignment##common.commaListSeparator## Dental crowding##common.commaListSeparator## Acceleration

要旨

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a single aligner appliance modified with nickel-titanium coils in accelerating the alignment of crowded lower incisors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 36 patients with mild crowding of their lower incisors were randomly divided into two groups: one group received a modified aligner appliance with nickel-titanium coils (Experimental group), while the other group received traditional orthodontic brackets (Control group). The degree of irregularity in the alignment of the incisors was measured every 2 weeks using Little's irregularity index, and this was done at different time points throughout the study: before treatment (T0), after 2 weeks (T1), after 4 weeks (T2), after 6 weeks (T3), after 8 weeks (T4).

RESULTS: A total of 87 patients with anterior mild crowding in the lower dental arch were initially assessed for eligibility. Out of these, 64 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eventually, 36 participants were assigned to receive the treatment. Accordingly, the data from 36 patients were analyzed statistically. There was no significant difference when comparing the two groups at T0, T1, T3, and T4. However, the difference was significant at T2 (p = 0.037). The differences were statistically significant at all time periods within each group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: The use of a modified aligner appliance with nickel-titanium coils effectively treats lower incisors crowding, but it does not accelerate the alignment process compared to the traditional fixed orthodontic appliance.

##submission.authorBiographies##

Ziad Mohamad Alhafi

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria

Nada Rajeh

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria

Zaher Jumaa

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria

Zuhir Alasfar

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria

##submission.citations##

The impact of labial fixed appliance orthodontic treatment on patient expectation, experience, and satisfaction: an overview of systematic reviews. Yassir YA, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR. Eur J Orthod. 2020 Jun; 42(3): 223-230. PMID: 31147683.

Prevalence of malocclusion, its association with occlusal interferences and temporomandibular disorders among the Saudi sub-population. Haralur SB, Addas MK, Othman HI, Shah FK, El-Malki AI, Al-Qahtani MA. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Jun; 13(2): 164-169. PMID: 24984617.

Oral health-related quality of life of adolescents after orthodontic treatment. A systematic review. Ferrando-Magraner E, García-Sanz V, Bellot-Arcís C, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM, Paredes-Gallardo V. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Feb; 11(2): e194-e202. PMID: 30805125.

The Inman Aligner for anterior tooth alignment. Qureshi A. Dent Update. 2008 Oct; 35(8): 569-571, 574-576. PMID: 19055094.

Assessment of perceived orthodontic appliance attractiveness. Ziuchkovski JP, Fields HW, Johnston WM, Lindsey DT. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr; 133(4 Suppl): S68-78. PMID: 18407023.

Relationship between patient discomfort, appliance acceptance and compliance in orthodontic therapy. Doll GM, Zentner A, Klages U, Sergl HG. J Orofac Orthop. 2000 Nov; 61(6): 398-413. PMID: 11126015.

Discomfort associated with Invisalign and traditional brackets: A randomized, prospective trial. White DW, Julien KC, Jacob H, Campbell PM, Buschang PH. Angle Orthod. 2017 Nov; 87(6): 801-808. PMID: 28753032.

The efficacy of orthodontic treatments for anterior crowding with Invisalign compared with fixed appliances using the Peer Assessment Rating Index. Lanteri V, Farronato G, Lanteri C, Caravita R, Cossellu G. Quintessence Int. 2018 Jun; 49(7): 581-587. PMID: 29881831.

[Possibilities and limitations of treatment with clear aligners. An orientation]. Doomen RA, Aydin B, Kuitert R. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2018 Oct; 125(10): 533-540. PMID: 30317374.

Protecting the integrity of mandibular incisor position through keystoning procedure and spring retainer appliance. Barrer HG. J Clin Orthod. 1975 Aug; 9(8): 486-494. PMID: 1072074.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of modified aligner appliance with nickel-titanium springs in treatment of mild crowding of lower incisors: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Alhafi ZM, Rajeh N. J World Fed Orthod. 2022 Aug; 11(4): 107-113. PMID: 35624004.

The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Little RM. Am J Orthod. 1975 Nov; 68(5): 554-563. PMID: 1059332.

Factors related to the rate of orthodontically induced tooth movement. Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Kiliaridis S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 May; 143(5): 616-621. PMID: 23631963.

Adult orthodontics--a review. Nattrass C, Sandy JR. Br J Orthod. 1995 Nov; 22(4): 331-337. PMID: 8580099.

A randomized clinical trial comparing mandibular incisor proclination produced by fixed labial appliances and clear aligners. Hennessy J, Garvey T, Al-Awadhi EA. Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep; 86(5): 706-712. PMID: 27571371.

Agreement of treatment recommendations based on digital vs plaster dental models. Ko HC, Liu W, Hou D, Torkan S, Spiekerman C, Huang GJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jan; 155(1): 135-142. PMID: 30591157.

Accuracy of digital dental models and three-dimensional printed dental models in linear measurements and Bolton analysis. Suryajaya W, Purbiati M, Ismah N. F1000Res. 2021 Sep; 10(2): 180. PMID: 33968366.

Evaluation of the fused deposition modeling and the digital light processing techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy of printing dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners. Jaber ST, Hajeer MY, Khattab TZ, Mahaini L. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Aug; 7(4): 591-600. PMID: 33258297.

A comparative study of forces in labial and lingual orthodontics using finite element method. Mascarenhas R, Chatra L, Shenoy S, Husain A, Mathew J, Dasnadi S. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2015 Mar; 49(1): 15-18. PMID: 158628.

A comparison between indirect and objective wear-time assessment of removable orthodontic appliances. Schott TC, Meyer-Gutknecht H, Mayer N, Weber J, Weimer K. Eur J Orthod. 2017 Apr; 39(2): 170-175. PMID: 27030283.

Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances and adjuncts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Al-Moghrabi D, Salazar FC, Pandis N, Fleming PS. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jul; 152(1): 17-32. PMID: 28651764.

Estimating arch length discrepancy through Little's Irregularity Index for epidemiological use. Bernabé E, Flores-Mir C. Eur J Orthod. 2006 Jun; 28(3): 269-273. PMID: 16648212.

On tooth movement. Isaacson RJ, Lindauer SJ, Davidovitch M. Angle Orthod. 1993 Dec; 63(4): 305-309. PMID: 8297056.

Concepts on Control of the Anterior Teeth Using the Lingual Appliance. Romano R. Semin Orthod. 2006 Sep; 12(3): 178-185. PMID: 101053.

Measuring system for in vivo recording of force systems in orthodontic treatment-concept and analysis of accuracy. Friedrich D, Rosarius N, Rau G, Diedrich P. J Biomech. 1999 Jan; 32(1): 81-85. PMID: 10050954.

##submission.downloads##

出版済

2024-05-09

巻号

巻 12 号 1 (2024)

セクション

Adults & the Elderly

##submission.license##

##submission.copyrightStatement##

##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.