Hypoxic conditions alter developing branchial arch-derived structures in zebrafish

Autori

  • Trish E Parsons
  • Seth M Weinberg
  • Michael Tsang
  • Alexandre R Vieira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2014.21

Abstract

Background: Previous epidemiological findings have implicated hypoxia as a risk factor for craniofacial defects including cleft lip, microtia and branchial arch anomalies. This study tests the hypothesis that hypoxic exposure results in craniofacial shape variation in a zebrafish model.

Methods: Three sets of zebrafish embryos were raised in uniform conditions with the exception of dissolved oxygen level.  At 24 hours past fertilization (hpf) embryos were placed in hypoxic conditions (70% or 50% dissolved oxygen tank water) and compared to unexposed control embryos.  After 24 hours of exposure to hypoxia, the embryos were incubated under normoxia.  Larvae were collected at 5 days post fertilization (dpf) and stained for cartilage. Images were taken of each specimen and subsequently landmarked to capture viscerocranial morphology.  A geometric morphometric analysis was performed to compare shape variation across groups.

Results: The mean branchial arch shape of each exposure group was significantly different from controls (p<0.001).  Principal components analysis revealed a clear separation of the three groups, with controls at one end of the shape spectrum, the 50% hypoxia group at the other end, and the 70% hypoxia group spanning the variation in between.

Conclusions: This experiment shows that hypoxia exposure at 24hpf is capable of affecting craniofacial shape in a dose-dependent manner.  These results may have implications not only for high altitude fetal health, but other environments, behaviors and genes that affect fetal oxygen delivery.

 

Riferimenti bibliografici

Unraveling human cleft lip and palate research. Vieira AR. J Dent Res. 2008 Feb;87(2):119-25. Review. PMID: 18218836.

Altitude as a risk factor for congenital anomalies. Castilla EE, Lopez-Camelo JS, Campaña H. Am J Med Genet. 1999 Sep 3;86(1):9-14. PMID: 10440822.

Hyperoxia and hypoxia in pregnancy: simple experimental manipulation alters the incidence of cleft lip and palate in CL/Fr mice. Millicovsky G, Johnston MC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Sep;78(9):5722-3. PMID: 6946511.

The effect of hypoxia on facial shape variation and disease phenotypes in chicken embryos. Smith F, Hu D, Young NM, Lainoff AJ, Jamniczky HA, Maltepe E, Hallgrimsson B, Marcucio RS. Dis Model Mech. 2013 Jul;6(4):915-24. doi: 10.1242/dmm.011064. Epub 2013 Apr 16. PMID: 23592613.

Prevalence rates of microtia in South America. Castilla EE, Orioli IM. Int J Epidemiol. 1986 Sep;15(3):364-8. PMID: 3771073.

Nüsslein-Volhard C, Gilmour DT, Dahm R (2002) Zebrafish as a system to study development and organogenesis. In: Nüsslein-Volhard C, Dahm R, editors. Zebrafish; A practical approach. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-5.

Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) mediates hypoxia-induced embryonic growth and developmental retardation. Kajimura S, Aida K, Duan C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 25;102(4):1240-5. Epub 2005 Jan 11. PMID: 15644436.

Understanding hypoxia-induced gene expression in early development: in vitro and in vivo analysis of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-regulated zebra fish insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 gene expression. Kajimura S, Aida K, Duan C. Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Feb;26(3):1142-55. PMID: 16428465.

Molecular dissection of craniofacial development using zebrafish. Yelick PC, Schilling TF. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002;13(4):308-22. Review. PMID: 12191958.

Sperber GH, Sperber SM, Guttman GD (2010) Craniofacial Embryogenetics and Development. Shelton: People's Medical Publishing House. 251p.

Jaw and branchial arch mutants in zebrafish II: anterior arches and cartilage differentiation. Piotrowski T1, Schilling TF, Brand M, Jiang YJ, Heisenberg CP, Beuchle D, Grandel H, van Eeden FJ, Furutani-Seiki M, Granato M, Haffter P, Hammerschmidt M, Kane DA, Kelsh RN, Mullins MC, Odenthal J, Warga RM, Nüsslein-Volhard C. Development. 1996 Dec;123:345-56. PMID: 9007254.

Asymmetric patterns in the cranial skeleton of zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to sodium pentachlorophenate at different embryonic developmental stages. López-Romero F1, Zúñiga G, Martínez-Jerónimo F. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012 Oct;84:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jul 19. PMID: 22818112.

Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘Revolution.’ Adams, DC, Rohlf JF, Slice DE. Ital J Zool. 2002 Jan;71:5-16.

Albertson RC, Yelick PC (2009) Morphogenesis of the jaw: Development beyond the embryo. In: Dietrich III HW, Westerfield M, Zon LI, editors. Essential Zebrafish Methods. Boston: Elsevier. pp. 457-477.

Rohlf FJ (1990) Rotational fit (Procrustes) methods. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL, editors. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Zoolog. pp. 227-236.

Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press. 478 p.

MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Klingenberg CP. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Mar;11(2):353-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x. Epub 2010 Oct 5. PMID: 21429143.

Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. Bookstein FL. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal. 1989 Jun;11(6):567-85.

Schilling TF (2002) The morphology of larval and adult zebrafish. In: Nuessleid-Volhand C, Dalm R, editors. Zebrafish. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 59-94.

Genetic basis of adaptive shape differences in the cichlid head. Albertson RC, Streelman JT, Kocher TD. J Hered. 2003 Jul-Aug;94(4):291-301. PMID: 12920100.

Jaw and branchial arch mutants in zebrafish I: branchial arches. Schilling TF, Piotrowski T, Grandel H, Brand M, Heisenberg CP, Jiang YJ, Beuchle D, Hammerschmidt M, Kane DA, Mullins MC, van Eeden FJ, Kelsh RN, Furutani-Seiki M, Granato M, Haffter P, Odenthal J, Warga RM, Trowe T, Nüsslein-Volhard C. Development. 1996 Dec;123:329-44. PMID: 9007253.

Specification and morphogenesis of the zebrafish larval head skeleton. Kimmel CB, Miller CT, Moens CB. Dev Biol. 2001 May 15;233(2):239-57. Review. PMID: 11336493.

Gorlin R (2001) Branchial arch and co-acral disorders. In: Gorlin R, Hennekam RC, editors. Syndromes of the head and neck. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 790-849.

Examination of a palatogenic gene program in zebrafish. Swartz ME1, Sheehan-Rooney K, Dixon MJ, Eberhart JK. Dev Dyn. 2011 Sep;240(9):2204-20. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22713. PMID: 22016187.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2014-08-07

Fascicolo

V. 2 N. 1 (2014)

Sezione

Development of Craniofacial Structures

Licenza

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.