Do different time intervals in placement of restorative materials over calcium silicate cements, affect interface microhardness of different restorative materials?

Autori

  • Behnam Bolhari Associate Professor of Endodontics, Laser Research Center of Dentistry, Dental School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Naghmeh Meraji Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Pegah Khazaee Dentist, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Sholeh Ghabraei Associate Professor, Department of Endodontics, Dental School/Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Sara Valizadeh Assistant Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran, Iran. Restorative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0383-7722

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2021.159

Parole chiave:

Calcium silicate cement, restorative materials, microhardness, time intervals

Abstract

Objectives: The type of materials and application time of final restorations on calcium silicate cements (CSCs) are important factors which influence the interfacial properties. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different placement time of RMGI (Resin Modified Glass Ionomer), composite resin and amalgam over different CSCs on the surface microhardness of these restorative materials.

Methods: Each CSCs material (Biodentine, MTA, CEM cement) was mixed and carried into a hole (6mm diameter ×4 mm thickness) in the center of 270 molds (n=90 /each CSC). Then these molds were randomly divided into three main experimental groups (n=30) in regard of restorative materials (Amalgam, RMGI, Composite) that were placed in the other molds with the same hole size to make restorative materials and CSCs in contact together. Afterwards, each experimental group was divided into three subgroups according to the time interval of restoration placement that was immediately, after 24h and after 72h (n=10). Two molds were separated from each other after one week storage in incubator with 100% humidity in 37 °C, in order to evaluate the Vickers microhardness of restorative materials in CSC-restorative material interface. Statistical analysis included two-way Anova followed by Post hoc Dunnett T3 in cases with lack of homogeneity and Tukey HSD in cases with homogeneity.(p=0.05)

Results: The microhardness of all restorative materials was neither significantly influenced by the CSCs materials (p>0.05) nor by the timing of final restoration (p>0.05) except in RMGI in immediate contact with CEM cement. (p<0.001)

Conclusion: Restorative materials hardness in interface with studied CSCs may not affect. This in vitro study found no evidence against immediate definitive restoration over CSCs.

 

Riferimenti bibliografici

Patel E, Pradeep P, Kumar P, Choonara YE, Pillay V. Oroactive dental biomaterials and their use in endodontic therapy. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2019 Apr 8.

da Rosa WL, Cocco AR, Silva TM, Mesquita LC, Galarca AD, Silva AF, Piva E. C urrent trends and future perspectives of dental pulp capping materials: A systematic review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2018 Apr;106(3):1358-68.

Zamparini F, Siboni F, Prati C, Taddei P, Gandolfi MG. Properties of calcium silicate-monobasic calcium phosphate materials for endodontics containing tantalum pentoxide and zirconium oxide. Clinical oral investigations. 2019 Jan 29;23(1):445-57.

Yazdi KA, Ghabraei S, Bolhari B, Kafili M, Meraji N, Nekoofar MH, Dummer PM. Microstructure and chemical analysis of four calcium silicate-based cements in different environmental conditions. Clinical oral investigations. 2019 Jan 29;23(1):43-52.

Parreira RM, Andrade TL, Luz AP, Pandolfelli VC, Oliveira IR. Calcium aluminate cement-based compositions for biomaterial applications. Ceramics International. 2016 Aug 1;42(10):11732-8.

Llaquet M, Mercadé M, Plotino G. Regenerative endodontic procedures: A review of the literature and a case report of an immature central incisor. Giornale italiano di endodonzia. 2017 Nov 1;31(2):65-72.

Torabinejad M, Parirokh M, Dummer PM. Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview–part II: other clinical applications and complications. International endodontic journal. 2018 Mar;51(3):284-317.

Palma P, Marques J, Falacho R, Vinagre A, Santos J, Ramos J. Does Delayed Restoration Improve Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Protocols to Calcium Silicate-Based Cements? Materials. 2018 Nov;11(11):2216.

Lipski M, Nowicka A, Kot K, Postek-Stefańska L, Wysoczańska-Jankowicz I, Borkowski L, Andersz P, Jarząbek A, Grocholewicz K, Sobolewska E, Woźniak K. Factors affecting the outcomes of direct pulp capping using Biodentine. Clinical oral investigations. 2018 Jun 1;22(5):2021-9.

Ha HT. The effect of the maturation time of calcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine™) on resin bonding: an in vitro study. Applied Adhesion Science. 2019 Dec 1;7(1):1.

Schmidt A, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Shear bond strength of lining materials to calcium silicate cements at different time intervals. J Adhes Dent. 2017 Mar 1;19(2):129-35.

Napte BD, Raghavendra SS. Evaluation of shear bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cements bonded to mineral trioxide aggregate: An in vitro study. Journal of Dental and Allied Sciences. 2015 Jul 1;4(2):73.

Bayram HM. Effect of Acidic Environment on Dislodgment Resistance of Different Silicate-based Root Repair Materials. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences. 2018; 2:24-8.

Nandini S, Ballal S, Kandaswamy D. Influence of glass-ionomer cement on the interface and setting reaction of mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a furcal repair material using laser Raman spectroscopic analysis. Journal of endodontics. 2007;33(2):167-72.

Tsujimoto M, Tsujimoto Y, Ookubo A, Shiraishi T, Watanabe I, Yamada S, et al. Timing for composite resin placement on mineral trioxide aggregate. Journal of endodontics. 2013;39(9):1167-70.

Tunç EŞ, Bayrak Ş, Eğilmez T. The evaluation of bond strength of a composite and a compomer to white mineral trioxide aggregate with two different bonding systems. Journal of Endodontics. 2008;34(5):603-5.

Caronna V, Himel V, Yu Q, Zhang J-F, Sabey K. Comparison of the surface hardness among 3 materials used in an experimental apexification model under moist and dry environments. Journal of endodontics. 2014;40(7):986-9.

Kazemipoor M, Azizi N, Farahat F. Evaluation of microhardness of mineral trioxide aggregate after immediate placement of different coronal restorations: an in vitro study. Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran). 2018;15(2):116.

Almuslet NA, Elamin H, Elbashir B. Hardness enhancement of amalgam teeth fillings using diode laser (675 nm). Journal of Analytical Science and Technology. 2011;2(2):64-8.

Rajih AK, Al-Sultani KF, Al-Kinani MA. Mechanical properties improvement of dental amalgam using TiO2 and ZnO. Life Sci J. 2015; 12:86-90.

Kaur M, Singh H, Dhillon JS, Batra M, Saini M. MTA versus biodentine: Review of literature with a comparative analysis. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2017;11(8): ZG01.

Sahebalam R, Boruziniat A, Mohammadzadeh F, Rangrazi A. Effect of the Time of Salivary Contamination during Light Curing on Degree of Conversion and Microhardness of a Restorative Composite Resin. Biomimetics. 2018;3(3):23.

Alzraikat H, Taha NA, Qasrawi D, Burrow MF. Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems. Dental materials journal. 2016;35(6):881-7.

AMBROSANO GMB, PUPPIN-RONTANI RM. Biomechanical degradation of the nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer surface. American Journal of Dentistry. 2012;25(6).

Elmi M, Ehsani M, Esmaeili B, Khafri S. Comparison of bond strength of a composite resin with two different adhesive systems and a resin modified glass ionomer to calcium enriched mixture. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2018;21(4):369.

Doozaneh M, Koohpeima F, Firouzmandi M, Abbassiyan F. Shear bond strength of self-adhering flowable composite and resin-modified glass ionomer to two pulp capping materials. Iranian endodontic journal. 2017;12(1):103.

CANTEK N K, AVC S. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®). Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2014; 22:302-6.

Gandolfi M, Spagnuolo G, Siboni F, Procino A, Rivieccio V, Pelliccioni G, et al. Calcium silicate/calcium phosphate biphasic cements for vital pulp therapy: chemical-physical properties and human pulp cells response. Clinical oral investigations. 2015;19(8):2075-89.

Bolhari B, Yazdi KA, Abbasi M, Sanjari S, Meraji N, Özcan M. Calcium silicate cement interface with restorative materials through layering after different time intervals. Odontology. 2021;109(1):210-21.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2021-09-10

Fascicolo

V. 9 N. 1 (2021)

Sezione

Adults & the Elderly

Licenza

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.