Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Edge File X7 and 2Shape Endodontic Systems: in vitro study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2024.569Parole chiave:
cyclic fatigue resistance, Edge File X7, 2Shape system, Endodontic , Canal curvatureAbstract
Objectives: In order to test the resistance of rotary instruments to cyclic fatigue fracture and its
importance in root canal preparationthe purpose of this study was to see how different tapers (4% and
6%) affected the cyclic fatigue resistance of the Edge File X7 and 2Shape endodontic systems at 45° and
60°canal curvature.
Methods: Eighty NiTi files from two different systems (N= 40 each) were used; Group 1: Edge File X7,
Group 2: 2Shape. each group was subdivided into four subgroups (N= 10 for each subgroup). The files
were evaluated for cyclic fatigue resistance using a modified custom-made static model with 45°and 60°
angles having a radius of 3mm and a diameter of 1.5 mm. Each file was rotated in a continuous rotation
motion at 300 rpm with 1.2 N.cm torque for TS1, 300 rpm with 2.5 N.cm torque for TS2, and Edge file X7
was used at 300 rpm and 3 N.cm. Until it fractured. The time it took to separate the files was noted. Each
file's number of cycles to failure was computed. A Kolmogorov-Smirnova normality test was done for all
groups, and a two-way ANOVA was used to statistically examine the data.
Results: The ranking of the groups from the highest to the lowest NCF was as follows: EdgeFile 4% 45
degrees (6594.00), EdgeFile 6% 45 degrees (6317.90), EdgeFile 4% 60 degrees (5682.00), EdgeFile 6% 60
degrees (2142.00), 2Shape 4% 45 degrees (2517.00), 2Shape 4% 60 degrees (535.90), 2Shape 6% 45
degrees (474.50), and 2Shape 6% 60 degrees (213.00). Conclusions: Edge File X7 showed better results than the 2Shape system. EdgeFile X7 4% at 45 degrees showed the highest NCF.
The 2Shape system 6% at 60 degree that showed lowest NCF. As the canal curvature increased the NCF decreased. Taper 4% is
better than taper 6%.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Comparative evaluation of instrumentation timing and cleaning efficacy in extracted primary molars using manual and NiTi rotary technique–Invitro study. Mehlawat, R., R. Kapoor, K. Gandhi, D. Kumar, R. Malhotra, and S. Ahuja. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019. 9(2): p. 151-155.
Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue and Reciproc files in an S-shaped canal. Topçuoğlu, H.S. and G. Topçuoğlu. J Endod. 2017. 43(10): p. 1679-1682.
Torsional Resistance of ProGlider, Hyflex EDM, and One G Glide Path Instruments. Inan, U. and C. Keskin. J Endod. 2019. 45(10): p. 1253-1257.
Cyclic fatigue resistance of new reciprocating files (Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and SmartTrack) in two different curved canals. Topçuoğlu, H.S., S. Demirbuga, S. Düzgün, and G. Topçuoğlu. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018. 9(3): p. e12344.
Effect of temperature of sodium hypochlorite on cyclic fatigue resistance of heat-treated reciprocating files. Keles, A., E.U. Ozyurek, M.O. Uyanik, and E. Nagas. J Endod. 2019. 45(2): p. 205-208.
Novel electronic device to quantify the cyclic fatigue resistance of endodontic reciprocating files after using and sterilization. Zubizarreta-Macho, Á., Ó. Alonso-Ezpeleta, A. Albaladejo Martínez, V. Faus Matoses, J. Caviedes Brucheli, R. Agustín-Panadero, J. Mena Álvarez, and F. Vizmanos Martínez-Berganza. Appl Sci. 2020. 10(14): p. 4962.
The Influence of NiTi Alloy on the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic Files. Ruiz-Sánchez, C., V. Faus-Llácer, I. Faus-Matoses, Á. Zubizarreta-Macho, S. Sauro, and V. Faus-Matoses. J Clin Med. 2020. 9(11): p. 1-16.
Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Heat-Treated Nickel-Titanium Instruments. Tanomaru-Filho, M., C. Galletti Espir, A. Carolina Venção, N. Macedo-Serrano, J. Camilo-Pinto, and J. Guerreiro-Tanomaru. Iran Endod J. 2018. 13(3): p. 312-317.
Symmetry of root and root canal morphology of mandibular incisors: A cone-beam computed tomography study in vivo. Valenti-Obino, F., D. Di Nardo, L. Quero, G. Miccoli, G. Gambarini, L. Testarelli, and M. Galli. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019. 11(6): p. e527-e533.
Shaping ability of 2Shape and NeoNiTi rotary instruments in preparation of curved canals using micro-computed tomography. Faisal, I., R. Saif, M. Alsulaiman, and Z.S. Natto. BMC Oral Health. 2021. 21(1): p. 595.
In Vivo Evaluation of Operative Torque Generated by Two Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments during Root Canal Preparation. Gambarini, G., M. Galli, M. Seracchiani, D. Di Nardo, M.A. Versiani, L. Piasecki, and L. Testarelli. Eur J Dent. 2019. 13(4): p. 556-562.
Role of the Crystallographic Phase of NiTi Rotary Instruments in Determining Their Torsional Resistance during Different Bending Conditions. Zanza, A., M. Seracchiani, R. Reda, D. Di Nardo, G. Gambarini, and L. Testarelli. Mater 2021. 14(21): p. 6324.
Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Pruett, J.P., D.J. Clement, and D.L. Carnes, Jr. J Endod. 1997. 23(2): p. 77-85.
Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Five Nickel Titanium Rotary File Systems with Different Manufacturing Techniques. Aminsobhani, M., N. Meraji, and E. Sadri. J Dent 2015. 12(9): p. 636-46.
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium coronal flaring instruments. Capar, I.D., H. Ertas, and H. Arslan. J Endod. 2014. 40(8): p. 1182-5.
Comparison between Single-file Rotary Systems: Part 2-The Effect of Length of the Instrument Subjected to Cyclic Loading on Cyclic Fatigue Resistance. Azim, A.A., M. Tarrosh, K.A. Azim, and L. Piasecki. J Endod. 2018. 44(12): p. 1837-1842.
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of novel nickel‐titanium rotary instruments. Capar, I.D., H. Ertas, and H. Arslan. Aust Endod J. 2015. 41(1): p. 24-28.
Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of three different endodontic rotary systems (an invitro study). Kadir, S.K. Erbil Dent J. 2021. 4(2): p. 175-181.
Cyclic fatigue resistance of various nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments at body temperature: an in vitro study. Saeed, D.H. and F.A. Rafea. Journal of Duhok University. 2019: p. 61-66.
Comparative evaluation of resistance to cyclic fatigue of three rotary endodontic Ni-Ti instruments. Intzes, L., Z.-D. Tzima, and C. Gogos. Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine. 2019. 23(1): p. 36-39.
Effect of movement kinematics on the cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium instruments. Karataş, E., H. Arslan, M. Büker, F. Seçkin, and I.D. Çapar. Int Endod J. 2016. 49(4): p. 361-4.
Mechanical and Metallurgical Evaluation of 3 Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: An In Vitro and In Laboratory Study. Zanza, A., P. Russo, R. Reda, P. Di Matteo, O. Donfrancesco, P. Ausiello, and L. Testarelli. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022. 9(5): p. 221.
Cyclic fatigue resistance of 2Shape, Twisted File and EndoSequence Xpress nickel-titanium rotary files at intracanal temperature. Uslu, G., T. Özyürek, M. Gündoğar, and K. Yılmaz. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018. 12(4): p. 283-287.
Cyclic fatigue resistance of waveone gold, protaper next and 2shape nickel titanium rotary instruments using a reliable method for measuring temperature. Olcay, K., T.F. Eyuboglu, and E. Erkan. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019. 22(10): p. 1335-1340.
Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of VDW.ROTATE, TruNatomy, 2Shape, and HyFlex CM nickel-titanium rotary files at body temperature. Gündoğar, M., G. Uslu, T. Özyürek, and G. Plotino. Restor Dent Endod. 2020. 45(3): p. e37.
The Effect of Multiple Autoclave Sterilization on the Cyclic Fatigue of Three Heat-Treated Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files: EdgeFile X7, Vortex Blue, and TRUShape. Sharroufna, R. and M. Mashyakhy. Biomed Res Int. 2020. 2020(2020): p. 1-6.
Cyclic fatigue resistance: comparison of AF F-One and One Curve rotary instruments with Hyflex EDM OneFile in root canal therapy. Ghahramani, Y., M. Sedigh-Shams, M. Atbaei, and S. Asar. Adv Appl NanoBio-Technol. 2022. 3(1): p. 14-17.
The effect of autoclave sterilization on Cyclic fatigue resistance of two Ni-Ti systems (an In-Vitro study). Fiad, A., M. El Faramawy, and S. Fahmy. Egypt Dentl J. 2021. 67(3): p. 2743-2747.
The Effect of Different Curvature Levels on Cyclic Fatigue of Three Single File NiTi Instruments (A comparative study). Altaay, A. and B. Shukri. Int. Medical J. 2020. 25(5): p. 2387-2394.
Cyclic fatigue resistance of P ro T aper N ext nickel‐titanium rotary files. Elnaghy, A.M. Intl Endod J. 2014. 47(11): p. 1034-1039.
Cyclic And Torsional Fatigue Resistance Of Heat Treated And Conventional Super Elastic Nickel-Titanium Files. Todd, S.J., S.J. Sidow, J.M. Dutner, P.M. Parker, D. Dickinson, and M.D. Uniformed Services Univ Of The Health Sciences Bethesda. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 2017. 20(8): p. 14.
Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments according to the Angle of File Access and Radius of Root Canal. Pedullà, E., G.R.M. La Rosa, C. Virgillito, E. Rapisarda, H.C. Kim, and L. Generali. J Endod. 2020. 46(3): p. 431-436.
33. Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 2Shape, ProTaper Gold and Vortex Blue rotary NiTi files in curved canals: a comparative in vitro study. Isaac, S., S. El Mankabadi, G. Ahmed, and H. Elasfouri. ENDO EPT 2020. 14(4): p. 297-304.
Effect of temperature on the cyclic fatigue resistance of thermally treated reciprocating instruments. Klymus, M.E., M.P. Alcalde, R.R. Vivan, M.V.R. Só, B.C. de Vasconselos, and M.A.H. Duarte. Clin Oral Investig. 2019. 23(7): p. 3047-3052.
Mechanical properties of a new and improved nickel-titanium alloy for endodontic use: an evaluation of file flexibility. Gambarini, G., R. Gerosa, M. De Luca, M. Garala, and L. Testarelli. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008. 105(6): p. 798-800.
Cyclic fatigue resistance and three‐dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel–titanium rotary systems. Grande, N.M., G. Plotino, R. Pecci, R. Bedini, V.A. Malagnino, and F. Somma. Int Endod J. 2006. 39(10): p. 755-763.
Effect of clinical use on the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Ounsi, H.F., Z. Salameh, T. Al-Shalan, M. Ferrari, S. Grandini, D.H. Pashley, and F.R. Tay. J Endod. 2007. 33(6): p. 737-741.
Evaluation of Cyclic Fatigue of Hyflex EDM, Twisted Files, and ProTaper Gold Manufactured with Different Processes: An In Vitro Study. Khandagale, P.D., P.P. Shetty, S.D. Makandar, P.A. Bapna, M.I. Karobari, A. Marya, P. Messina, and G.A. Scardina. Int J Dent. 2021. 2021(2021): p. 1-6.
Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape and WaveOne instruments using different angles of curvature. Elsaka, S.E. and A.M. Elnaghy. Dent Mater J. 2015. 34(3): p. 358-63.
Cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary NiTi instruments produced with four different manufacturing methods. Keskin, N.B. and U. Inan. Microsc Res Tech. 2019. 82(10): p. 1642-1648.
Cyclic fatigue resistance of novel Genius and Edgefile nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments. Bueno, C.R.E., M.T.S. Cury, A.M.V. Vasques, G. Sivieri-Araújo, R.C. Jacinto, J.E. Gomes-Filho, L.T.A. Cintra, and E. Dezan-Júnior. Braz Oral Res. 2019. 33(028): p. 1-9.
Cyclic fatigue resistance of protaper gold, Edgefile, oneshape and protaper universal. Khalil, W.A.-B., K. Merdad, T.S. Abu-Haimed, M. Howait, and L. Alsofi. Egypt Dent J. 2018. 64(1): p. 589-596.
Cyclic fatigue resistances of Hyflex EDM, WaveOne gold, Reciproc blue and 2shape NiTi rotary files in different artificial canals. Özyürek, T., M. Gündoğar, G. Uslu, K. Yılmaz, S. Staffoli, G. Nm, G. Plotino, and A. Polimeni. Odontology. 2018. 106(4): p. 408-413.
Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. Parashos, P., I. Gordon, and H.H. Messer. J Endod. 2004. 30(10): p. 722-5.
Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 2Shape, ProTaper Gold and Vortex Blue rotary NiTi files in curved canals: a comparative in vitro study. El Mankabadi, S.I., G.M. Ahmed, and H.A. ElAsfouri. Endod Prac Today. 2020. 14(4): p. 297-304.
Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of One Curve, 2Shape, ProFile Vortex, Vortex Blue, and RaCe Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Single and Double Curvature Canals. Elnaghy, A.M. and S.E. Elsaka. J Endod. 2018. 44(11): p. 1725-1730.
Cyclic fatigue resistance of reduced-taper nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments in doubled-curved (S-shaped) canals at body temperature. Uslu, G., M. Gundogar, T. Özyurek, and G. Plotino. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020. 14(2): p. 111.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmed Mustaf Mohammed, Ashraf Salim Alchalabi
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
