Effectiveness of Clove Extract-Dental Flossing in Reduction of Supragingival Biofilm

Autori

  • Dhuha Malek Hasan PhD Preventive Dentistry- Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Babylon, Al-Hilla, Babylon, Iraq
  • Mukhaled Louay Ali
  • Israa Hussein Ali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2026.1176

Parole chiave:

Dental plaque, Biofilm, Oral hygiene

Abstract

Objective: Dental biofilm in interproximal locations is difficult to manage with a toothbrush. Consequently, some products, such as dental floss, may be in benefit for these specific locations, with natural ingredients that can be used as a long-term substitute for mouthwashes with chemical-based bacterial resistance. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dental floss impregnated with clove extract versus, using a dental floss impregnated with 5% chlorhexidine gluconate in terms for reducing a supragingival biofilm. Materials and Methods: Eighty children, aged 12 to 15, from undergraduate clinics in Babylon University's Faculty of Dentistry in Iraq, were sampled for this study and split equally into four groups. Group 1 (negative control) did not use waxed floss without mouthwash; Group 2 (positive control) flossed without impregnation with mouthwash twice daily; Group 3 (positive control) flossed with chlorhexidine gluconate twice daily; and Test Group 4 (G4) used the same dental floss twice daily with clove extract impregnation. Every group was assessed in this study after two and four weeks, respectively. Using the (Quigley-Hein Index) in which was modified by Turesky et al, the presence of a biofilm was assessed to the four surfaces (mesiobuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, and distolingual), giving each tooth four scores. Results: Between and within groups, there was a highly significant difference (P < 0.001) at two and four weeks. In group 4, the mean dental plaque value was the lowest. Conclusion: In comparison to dental floss impregnated with chlorhexidine gluconate, and traditional waxed floss, it was determined, that the use of dental floss impregnated with clove extract produced further decreases in the supragingival biofilm on the anterior teeth.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2026-04-07

Fascicolo

V. 14 N. 1 (2026)

Sezione

Mechanisms of Oral Disease

Licenza

Copyright (c) 2026 Dhuha Malek Hasan, Mukhaled Louay Ali, Israa Hussein Ali

Creative Commons License

TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.