Manual and rotary instrumentation techniques for root canal preparation in primary molars

Auteurs-es

  • Francinne M. Rosa
  • Adriana Modesto University of Pittsburgh
  • Italo M. Faraco-Junior

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2014.19

Mots-clés :

instrumentation, primary tooth, root canal therapy

Résumé

Introduction: Although rotary instrumentation has been widely studied in permanent dentition, it is a rather new field of study concerning primary teeth. Purpose: We aimed to evaluate apical displacement and time needed for instrumentation of root canals of primary molars by manual and rotary techniques. Materials and Methods: Root canals of 144 extracted first and second primary maxillary molars were randomly divided into 2 groups: I- manual instrumentation (K-files); II- rotary instrumentation (K3 Rotary System®). The canals were radiographed with pathfinding files in place, prepared by both techniques, and instrumentation time was recorded. After preparation, root canals were radiographed again with pathfinding files in place. To analyze the degree of apical displacement, digital images were superimposed using the Adobe Photoshop® software. Results: Mean apical displacement (0.70 mm) in the manual instrumentation group was not statistically different from that in the rotary instrumentation group (0.79 mm). However, mean time for root canal preparation was significantly shorter using the rotary system (128.0 s) than using the manual system (174.0 s) (p<0.05). Conclusions: The use of rotary instrumentation in pediatric dentistry is feasible, offering time-saving advantages in root canal preparation.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Adriana Modesto, University of Pittsburgh

Department of Pediatric Dentistry

Références

. Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickel-titanium hand instruments. Deplazes P, Peters O, Barbakow F.

J Endod. 2001 Mar;27(3):196-202. PMID: 11487151

. Effectiveness of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques for cleaning flattened root canals. Barbizam JV, Fariniuk LF, Marchesan MA, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. J Endod. 2002 May;28(5):365-6. PMID: 12026920

. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Schäfer E, Schlingemann R. Int Endod J. 2003 Mar;36(3):208-17. PMID: 12657147

. A comparison of Profile, Hero 642, and K3 instrumentation systems in teeth using digital imaging analysis. González-Rodrguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Jan;97(1):112-5. PMID: 14716266

. In vitro evaluation of the thermal alterations on the root surface during preparation with different Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Capelli A, Guerisoli DM, Barbin EL, Spanó JC, Pécora JD. Braz Dent J. 2004;15(2):115-8. Epub 2005 Mar 11. PMID: 15776193

. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Pediatr Dent. 1999 Nov-Dec;21(7):453-4. PMID: 10633522

. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb;22(1):77-8. PMID: 10730297

. A three-dimensional study of canal curvatures in the mesial roots of mandibular molars. Cunningham CJ, Senia ES. J Endod. 1992 Jun;18(6):294-300. PMID: 1402588

. Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars. Nazari Moghaddam K, Mehran M, Farajian Zadeh H. Iran Endod J. 2009 Spring;4(2):53-7. Epub 2009 Apr 17. PMID: 23940486

. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals. Azar MR, Mokhtare M. Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;22(2):363. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.84283. PMID: 21891918

. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, Perez L. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Summer;32(4):295-8. PMID: 18767460

. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT. Musale PK, Mujawar SA. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014 Apr;15(2):113-20. doi: 10.1007/s40368-013-0072-1. Epub 2013 Jul 27. PMID: 23893606

. In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar. Nagaratna PJ, Shashikiran ND, Subbareddy VV. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006 Dec;24(4):186-91. PMID: 17183182

. Ex vivo study of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth. Kummer TR, Calvo MC, Cordeiro MM, de Sousa Vieira R, de Carvalho Rocha MJ. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Apr;105(4):e84-92. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.008. PMID: 18329573

. Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. Silva LA, Leonardo MR, Nelson-Filho P, Tanomaru JM. J Dent Child (Chic). 2004 Jan-Apr;71(1):45-7. PMID: 15272656

. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy. Canoglu H, Tekcicek MU, Cehreli ZC. Pediatr Dent. 2006 Nov-Dec;28(6):518-23. PMID: 17249433

. Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth. Ochoa-Romero T, Mendez-Gonzalez V, Flores-Reyes H, Pozos-Guillen AJ. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Summer;35(4):359-63. PMID: 22046692

. K-file vs ProFiles in cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in primary molar root canals: an in vitro study. Madan N, Rathnam A, Shigli AL, Indushekar KR. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Jan-Mar;29(1):2-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.79907. PMID: 21521910

. Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars. Pinheiro SL, Araujo G, Bincelli I, Cunha R, Bueno C. Int Endod J. 2012 Apr;45(4):379-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365 2591.2011.01987.x. Epub 2011 Dec 22. PMID: 22188162

. Comparison of apical transportation in four Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation techniques.

Iqbal MK, Maggiore F, Suh B, Edwards KR, Kang J, Kim S. J Endod. 2003 Sep;29(9):587-91. PMID: 14503833

. Root canal transportation with a Ni-Ti rotary file system and stainless steel hand files in simulated root canals. Loizides A, Eliopoulos D, Kontakiotis E. Quintessence Int. 2006 May;37(5):369-74. PMID: 16683684

. Debris retention and wear in three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Elmsallati EA, Wadachi R, Ebrahim AK, Suda H. Aust Endod J. 2006 Dec;32(3):107-11. PMID: 17201751

. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Guelzow A, Stamm O, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Int Endod J. 2005 Oct;38(10):743-52. PMID: 16164689

. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Jodway B, Hülsmann M. Int Endod J. 2006 Jan;39(1):71-80. PMID: 16409331

. Deformation and fracture of RaCe and K3 endodontic instruments according to the number of uses. Troian CH, Só MV, Figueiredo JA, Oliveira EP. Int Endod J. 2006 Aug;39(8):616-25. PMID: 16872456

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2014-05-27

Numéro

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014)

Rubrique

Infancy & Adolescence

Licence

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.