Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction with Conventional Complete Dentures
A Retrospective Study from An Academic Prosthodontics Clinic
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2026.1585Mots-clés :
Complete Dentures, Patient Satisfaction, Prosthodontics, Retention, Stability, Quality of LifeRésumé
To restore masticatory efficiency, phonetic capability and facial aesthetics, conventional complete dentures exist as an important treatment modality for complete edentulism. With a clinical approach and prosthetic success, we need the patient's experience to be better informed. In this study, we investigate patient satisfaction with conventional complete dentures according to aesthetic perception, functional adaptation, comfort and stability, alongside assessing potential demographic influences such as age and gender. A retrospective observational study was conducted on 100 edentulous patients from September 2023 to March 2024 at the College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University. Data on demographic parameters and clinical variables were obtained. Satisfaction in patients was measured on a three-point Likert scale (1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good) for seven parameters. Chi-square tests, independent sample t-tests, and correlation matrices were used for analysis. The median age of the participants in this study was 61.2 ± 9.3 years with a ratio of males to females of about 4:1. Satisfaction scores mostly were based on aesthetics (2.54 ± 0.69) and cleaning experience (2.58 ± 0.63). On the other hand, stability (2.13 ± 0.88) and comfort (2.17 ± 0.86) were the most frequently cited areas of patient dissatisfaction. There was no significant gender or age difference in satisfaction (p > 0.05). Stability (r = 0.81) and comfort (r = 0.78) were associated with overall satisfaction. Although they do serve very well to suit the aesthetic requirements of the patient in conventional dentures, functional retention and long-term comfort are still significant challenges. Better border molding accuracy, occlusion balance, and follow-up protocols are needed to optimize clinical outcomes after the insertion and post-insertion.
Références
[1] Borg-Bartolo, R., Roccuzzo, A., Molinero Mourelle, P., Schimmel, M., Gambetta-Tessini, K., Chaurasia, A., Koca-Unsal, R.B., Tennert, C., Giacaman, R., and Campus, G. “Global prevalence of edentulism and dental caries in middle-aged and elderly persons: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Journal of Dentistry, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104335.
[2] Heboyan, A., Kaur, K., Saini, R.S., Kanji, M.A., Alarcón-Sánchez, M.A., Mosaddad, S.A., Fiorillo, L., and Flores-Fraile, J. “Implant-Supported and Conventional Dentures: A Meta-Analysis in Older Adults.” International Dental Journal, vol. 76, 2026, article no. 109782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.109782.
[3] Mabrouk, Y., Ammar, S., Labidi, A., Mansour, L., and Ghouli, S. “Dental Prosthetic Treatments in Cleidocranial Dysplasia: Case Report and Literature Review.” Case Reports in Dentistry, vol. 2020, 2020, article no. 8910798. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8910798.
[4] Soboleva, U., and Rogovska, I. “Edentulous Patient Satisfaction with Conventional Complete Dentures.” Medicina, vol. 58, 2022, article no. 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030344.
[5] Tew, I.M., Soo, S.Y., and Pow, E.H.N. “Digitally versus conventionally fabricated complete dentures: A systematic review on cost-efficiency analysis and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.028.
[6] Chiddarwar, R., Bhoyar, A., Dubey, S.A., Dhamande, M.M., and Khubchandani, S.R. “Refining Complete Dentures: Optimizing Results with Enhanced Phonetics and Esthetics.” Cureus, vol. 16, no. 6, 2024, article no. e62938. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.62938.
[7] Fenlon MR, Sherriff M. Investigation of factors influencing patient satisfaction with new complete dentures: A prospective study. J Dent. 2018;72:30-6.
[8] Bhutta, H.E., Moharamzadeh, K., Martin, R., and Martin, N. “Patient Satisfaction with Upper and Lower Complete Dentures: A Service Evaluation Report.” European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 31, no. 1, 2023, pp. 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2416Bhutta13.
[9] Al-Dwairi ZN, Al Sharafat F, Al-Wahadni A. Gender differences in patient satisfaction with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127(3):409-15.
[10] Okamoto, M., Yoshida, M., Tsuga, K., Matsuo, K., Ikebe, K., Ueda, T., and Minakuchi, S. “Associations of sex, age, and number of remaining teeth with performance on oral hypofunction tests.” Gerodontology, vol. 42, no. 1, 2025, pp. 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12770
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Bestun Luqman Akram, Rayan Nawzad Rostam, Zikra Yassim Kareem, Lana Lade Muhammad, Nabil Abdulsattar Assad 2026
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
