Evaluation of Provisional Restorations

Forfattere

  • Hussein Hayder Qasim First Specialized Dental Center, Kirkuk Health Directorate, Kirkuk, Iraq.
  • Mohammed A. Abdulla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2026.1117

Nøgleord:

CAD/CAM, 3D Printing, Prosthodontics

Resumé

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the flexural strength, microhardness, surface roughness, and color stability of provisional materials made using 3D printing, CAD/CAM, and conventional techniques. Materials and Methods: A total of 168 samples were fabricated and divided into three groups. Group A: 3D-printed at build angles of 0°, 15°, and 45°, Group B: CAD/CAM milled at high and low speeds, and Group C: Conventional self-curing interim resin. All samples were tested for flexural strength, microhardness, surface roughness, and color stability. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and t-tests at a significance level of 0.05. Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among groups (P ≤ 0.05). The 15° 3D-printed group showed the highest flexural strength (149.33 MPa), while the CAD/CAM low-speed group had the lowest (95.83 MPa). The conventional resin showed the highest microhardness (23.7), whereas the 3D-printed 45° had the lowest (11.61). 3D-printed 15° exhibited the highest surface roughness (6.45 μm), while 3D-printed 0° and conventional had smoother surface mean values (0.412, 0.656 μm, respectively). CAD/CAM low-speed demonstrated the best color stability (ΔE = 1.18), while 3D-printed 45° showed the highest discoloration (ΔE = 7.42). Conclusion: Fabrication method significantly affects the properties of provisional restorations. While 3D printing offers high strength, it compromises hardness, smoothness, and color stability. Conventional and CAD/CAM methods provide a better balance in clinical performance. Clinical Significance: The method used to fabricate provisional restorations significantly influences their mechanical and esthetic properties, which directly affects their clinical performance, durability, and patient satisfaction. 3D Printing (especially at a 15° build angle) yields high flexural strength, making it suitable for load-bearing areas or cases requiring strong interim restorations. However, it has lower microhardness, rougher surfaces, and poorer color stability, which may lead to faster wear, plaque accumulation, and esthetic deterioration over time. Conventional self-curing resins offer higher hardness and smoother surfaces, which are beneficial for wear resistance and patient comfort, but may lack the strength of digitally fabricated options. CAD/CAM materials, particularly those milled at low speeds, exhibit excellent color stability, making them ideal for visible anterior regions where esthetics are critical. However, their lower flexural strength could be a limitation in certain clinical situations.

Downloads

Publiceret

2026-02-10

Nummer

Årg. 14 Nr. 1 (2026)

Sektion

Adults & the Elderly

Licens

Copyright (c) 2026 Hussein Hayder Qasim, Mohammed A. Abdulla

Creative Commons License

Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse (by).

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.