Citric Acid Irrigation Protocols for Bioceramic Sealers for Root Canal Retreatments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2025.972Keywords:
bioceramic sealer, endodonticsAbstract
Objective: Root canals treated with bioceramic sealers that need retreatment present a clinical challenge. The presented study assessed 20% citric acid (with and without activation) in removing bioceramic sealer remnants. Material and Methods: Thirty extracted human lower premolars teeth were obturated with gutta-percha using bioceramic sealer, and have been split into three groups, each consisting of ten teeth: (1) 20% citric acid without activation, (2) 20% citric acid with ultrasonic activation, and (3) control group utilizing ProTaper Universal retreatment files exclusively. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to investigate the remaining sealer remnants at the coronal, middle and apical thirds. The percentage of the uncleaned canal areas was determined quantitatively with the use of ImageJ software. Results: One-Way ANOVA had shown a significant difference between groups (p less than 0.001). At 64.8% ± 3.1, the control group had the greatest mean residual debris. While ultrasonic activation further improved cleaning efficacy (44.0% 2.6), irrigation with citric acid greatly reduced remnants (50.8% 4.9). Applying ultrasonic activation had the biggest cleaning impact in the apical third. In the apical third, the lowest debris was observed in the activation group (41.1% ± 0.9) vs. 45.3% (citric alone) and 65.7% (control). In the middle third, respective values were 44.1%, 51.5%, and 64.1%. In the coronal third, results were 64.8%, 55.5%, and 64.5%, respectively. Conclusion: According to our results, citric acid irrigation significantly enhances the removal of bioceramic sealer remnants from root canal walls, particularly when combined with ultrasonic activation. Compared to mechanical retreatment alone, the combination of chemical irrigation and activation resulted in a greater reduction of residual material. Citric acid significantly enhances the removal of bioceramic sealer remnants, particularly in the middle and apical thirds. Ultrasonic activation further improves efficacy, with the apical third showing the most notable improvement (41.1% vs. 65.7% in control). This protocol demonstrates a clinically effective and practical approach to improving the efficiency of endodontic retreatment procedures.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mustafa Imad Saleh , Emad Farhan Alkhalidi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.