Alveolar ridge augmentation in mandible by use the modified distractor.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2022.216

Keywords:

horizontal alveolar, vertical alveolar, distraction osteogenesis, distractor

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the horizontal and the vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis using modified alveolar distractor.

Study design: The sample consisted of 7 patients presenting horizontally and vertically deficient edentulous ridges were treated by distraction osteogenesis with a modified Alveolar distractor. The surgical procedure was carried out with the patient under local anesthesia. After the osteotomy was performed with pizosurgery, the distractor was placed on the segmental bone over the gingiva for 3 months. The rate of distraction was 0.5 mm/twice a day.

Results: The mean of horizontal alveolar before using the distractor was 4.70 mm (SD 0.31 mm) The mean of horizontal alveolar after using the distractor was 8.30 mm (Sd 0.59 mm). The mean of actual gain in bone horizontal at the end of the distraction period was 3.58 mm (SD 0.15 mm). The mean of height alveolar before using the distractor was 6.67 mm (SD 0.46 mm) The mean of height alveolar after using the distractor was 12.59 mm (SD 0.52 mm). The mean of actual gain in bone height at the end of the distraction period was 5.92 mm (SD 0.25 mm).

Conclusion: It was concluded that the modified alveolar distractor seems to be an effective to treat horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge deficiencies, and distraction osteogenesis can be considered a safe and effective procedure for gaining bone in the horizontal and the vertical dimension of the alveolar.

Author Biography

Maher Al-assaf, Department of Oral Histology and Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.

Department of Oral Histology and Pathology

References

Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):203-215. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01271.x. PMID: 18724851.

The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Evidence-based practice: Toward optimizing clinical outcomes. 2010:195-218. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-05025-1_13.

Use of alveolar distraction osteogenesis for anterior maxillary defect reconstruction. Marcantonio C, Nícoli LG, Pigossi SC, Araújo RFSB, Boeck EM, Junior EM. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019 Jul-Aug;23(4):381-386. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_549_18. PMID: 31367139.

The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Autumn;2(3):167-184. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-05025-1_13. PMID: 20467628.

Alveolar osteogenic distraction as method to increase the alveolar ridge. Navarro DM. Revista Cubana de Estomatología. 2011;48(1):43-55.

Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis. Rachmiel A, Srouji S, Peled M. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2001 Dec;30(6):510-517. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2001.0134.

Alveolar osteogenic distraction as method to increase the alveolar ridge. TNavarro DM. Revista Cubana de Estomatología. 2011;48(1):43-55.

Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant treatments of the vertical bone atrophy: A systematic review. Toledano-Serrabona J, Sánchez-Garcés MÁ, Sánchez-Torres A, Gay-Escoda C. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Jan;24(1):e70-e75. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22750. PMID: 30573711.

Evaluation of osseous regeneration in alveolar distraction osteogenesis with histological and radiological aspects. Türker N, Basa S, Vural G. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Apr;65(4):608-614. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.057. PMID: 17368352.

Vertical bone augmentation of posterior mandibular region: a description of two surgical techniques. Queiroz AG, Silva YS, Costa PJ, Ferraz FW, Naclério-Homem MD. RGO-Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia. 2016 Jul;64:333-336. doi: 10.1590/1981-8637201600030000143128.

Comparison of intraosseous and extraosseous alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Uckan S, Oguz Y, Bayram B. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Apr;65(4):671-674. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.045. PMID: 17368362.

Partially Biodegradable Distraction Implant to Replace Conventional Implants in Alveolar Bone of Insufficient Height: A Preliminary Study in Dogs. Li T, Zhang Y, Shao B, Gao Y, Zhang C, Cao Q, Kong L. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1164-1173. doi: 10.1111/cid.12229. PMID: 24888978.

The reconstructive potential of distraction osteogenesis on defects of the alveolar ridge before dental implants placement: a review. Matoulas E, Nazaroglou I, Kafas P, Charitoudi D. Research Journal of Medical Sciences. 2009;3(3):123-132.

Morphofunctional and clinical study on mandibular alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Zaffe D, Bertoldi C, Palumbo C, Consolo U. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Oct;13(5):550-557. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130516.x. PMID: 12453134.

Implant prosthetic rehabilitation in partially edentulous patients with bone atrophy. An umbrella review based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Merli M, Moscatelli M, Pagliaro U, Mariotti G, Merli I, Nieri M. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(3):261-280. PMID: 30246181.

Comparison of Two Techniques for Lateral Ridge Augmentation in Mandible With Ramus Block Graft. Barbu HM, Andreescu CF, Lorean A, Kolerman R, Moraru L, Mortellaro C, Mijiritsky E. J Craniofac Surg. 2016 May;27(3):662-667. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002561. PMID: 27092913.

Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients. von Arx T, Buser D. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Aug;17(4):359-366. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01234.x. PMID: 16907765.

Quality and quantity of bone following alveolar distraction osteogenesis in the human mandible. Chiapasco M, Lang NP, Bosshardt DD. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Aug;17(4):394-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01247.x. PMID: 16907770.

Implant success in distracted bone versus autogenous bone-grafted sites. Elo JA, Herford AS, Boyne PJ. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(4):181-184. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336-35.4.181. PMID: 19813422.

Alveolar width distraction osteogenesis for early implant placement. Laster Z, Rachmiel A, Jensen OT. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Dec;63(12):1724-1730. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.09.001. PMID: 16297692.

Biology of Bone Formation, Fracture Healing, and Distraction Osteogenesis. Runyan CM, Gabrick KS. J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jul;28(5):1380-1389. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003625. PMID: 28562424.

Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis. Block MS, Chang A, Crawford C. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Mar;54(3):309-314. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90750-8. PMID: 8600238.

Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for bone augmentation of severely atrophic ridges in 10 consecutive cases: a histologic and histomorphometric study. Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G, Pieri F, Degidi M, Piattelli A. J Periodontol. 2007 Feb;78(2):360-366. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060260. PMID: 17274727.

Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jun;38(6):609-625. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028. PMID: 19464146.

Comparing the duration of different phases of vertical alveolar distraction between ultrasound treated and control group in anterior mandible. Al-Kassaby A, Shindy M. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 May;48:54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.163.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-09

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Adults & the Elderly

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.