Comparative evaluation of retentive strength of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to custom tray using different tray adhesives: An In Vitro study

Authors

  • Jinsa P Devassy Mar Baselios Dental College, Kerala, India
  • Nishna Pradeep Kannur Dental college, Kerala, India
  • A V Sreekumar Kannur Dental college, Kerala, India
  • Jimmy George Mar Baselios Dental College, Kerala, India
  • Jittin James Indira Gandhi Dental College, Kerala, India
  • Jacob George Mar Baselios Dental College, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2020.94

Keywords:

Tray adhesive, Polyvinyl siloxane impression material, Retentive strength

Abstract

The retentive strength of the impression material to the impression tray is an important factor that can affect the quality of the final impression. Separation of the impression from the tray or tearing of the impression while removing from the mouth could be one of the reasons for distortion. It is imperative to know the most effective tray adhesive which can be used with different brands of rubber-based impression material. So, this study was directed to compare the different tray adhesives that can be effectively used in our day-to-day clinical practice.

 

Author Biographies

Jinsa P Devassy, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kerala, India

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics

Nishna Pradeep, Kannur Dental college, Kerala, India

Professor, Department of Prosthodontics

A V Sreekumar, Kannur Dental college, Kerala, India

HOD & Professor, Department of Prosthodontics

Jimmy George, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kerala, India

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics

Jittin James, Indira Gandhi Dental College, Kerala, India

Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics

Jacob George, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kerala, India

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics

References

Michael N. Mandikos. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: An update on clinical use. Aust Dent J 1998 Feb;43(6):428–34.

Mohd. Zainal Abidin Mohd Sulong and Derrick J. Setchell, University of Malaya, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and Institute of Dental, Surgery, London, England. Properties of the tray adhesive of an addition polymerizing silicone to impression tray materials. J Prosthet Dent 1991 66:743–7.

Ashwini B.L, Manjunath S, Mathew K.X. The bond strength of different tray adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane to two tray materials: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Mar;14(1):29–37.

Bomberg T.J, Goldfogel M.H, Hoffman W, Bomberg S.E. Considerations for adhesion of impression materials to impression trays. J Prosthet Dent. 1988 Dec;60(6):681–4.

Samman J.M., Fletcher A. A study of impression tray adhesives. Quintessence Int Berl Ger 1985. 1985 Apr;16(4):305–9.

Tjan AH, Whang SB. Comparing effects of tray treatment on the accuracy of dies. J Prosthet Dent. 1987 Aug;58(2):175–8.

Peregrina A, Land M.F, Wandling C, Johnston W.M. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Sep;94(3):209–13.

Payne J.A, Pereira B.P. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Dec;74(6):563–8.

Marafie Y, Looney S, Nelson S, Chan D, Browning W, Rueggeberg F. Retention strength of impression materials to a tray material using different adhesive methods: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Dec;100(6):432–40.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-04

Issue

Section

Adults & the Elderly